Adjournment debate on Monday, 19 March 2012, in the House of Commons, led by John Robertson. The answering member was Mark Prisk.
Shipbuilding
Adjournment debate on shipbuilding.
Secondary information
- Type
- Parliamentary proceeding
- Reference
- 542 c615-24
- Session
- 2010-12
- Department
- Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Proceeding contributions
-
Speaker | 542 c622 (Link to this contribution) Order. To seek to intervene one minute, and then very ostentatiously and blatantly to be fiddling wi...
-
Mark Prisk | 542 c622-4 (Link to this contribution) I cannot promise the hon. Member for Glasgow North West that we will return to large-scale shipbuild...
-
Speaker | 542 c622 (Link to this contribution) Order. The hon. Gentleman sought to intervene on a number of occasions. He was perfectly entitled to...
-
Thomas Docherty | 542 c620 (Link to this contribution) As the Minister will know, refitting the two carriers in Rosyth would give my constituency 50 years ...
-
Mark Prisk | 542 c619-20 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right to say that we have seen a wind down so that over the next 10...
-
Mark Prisk | 542 c620-1 (Link to this contribution) All the Royal Navy's current warships are built in the United Kingdom. Scotland has a strong and ski...
-
John Robertson | 542 c621 (Link to this contribution) Does the Minister not accept, however, that the rules we in this country play by are not the same as...
-
Mark Prisk | 542 c621 (Link to this contribution) I must tell the hon. Gentleman, with respect, that the debate was initiated by the hon. Member for G...
-
Speaker | 542 c622 (Link to this contribution) Order. I apologise for interrupting the Minister, but may I gently say to the hon. Member for Na h-E...
-
Mark Prisk | 542 c622 (Link to this contribution) I will make progress, if I may. The Technology Strategy Board is helping to co-ordinate a future te...
-
John Robertson | 542 c617-8 (Link to this contribution) My hon. Friend will appreciate that the companies do not want to be named, for obvious reasons—their...
-
Russell Brown | 542 c616 (Link to this contribution) In view of my hon. Friend's discussions with the all-party group, will he tell the House why those c...
-
John Robertson | 542 c615-6 (Link to this contribution) My speech tonight might be about shipbuilding, but it is fundamentally about commitment—to a traditi...
-
John Robertson | 542 c619 (Link to this contribution) The Minister, with his limited time, is generous in giving way. Does he agree that the reason why we...
-
Mark Prisk | 542 c622 (Link to this contribution) I understand that point. The point has been made that the complexity of warships can make it quite d...
-
Mark Prisk | 542 c618-9 (Link to this contribution) I congratulate the hon. Member for Glasgow North West (John Robertson) on securing the debate, and o...
- Subjects
- Procurement Scotland Shipbuilding Tankers Tide class tankers
- Link
- View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Show all contributions (16)
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 21:02:31 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_98151
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_98151
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_98151