Written question asked by Lord Field of Birkenhead (Independent (affiliation)) on Tuesday, 2 April 2019, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 4 April 2019. It was answered by Claire O'Neill (Conservative) on Wednesday, 10 April 2019 on behalf of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
Iron and Steel: Manufacturing Industries
- Question
-
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, if he will that steps to (a) remove the electricity price disparity for the steel industry, (b) establish a Future Steel Challenge Fund, (c) strengthen the steel procurement guidelines and their reporting mechanisms, and (d) remove plant and machinery from business rates valuations.
- Answer
-
The Government is committed to minimising energy costs for businesses to ensure that the UK economy remains strong and competitive. We recognise that the UKâs industrial electricity costs are currently higher than those of our competitors, and so we have taken steps to reduce the cumulative impact of energy and climate change policies on the price of industrial electricity for key industries, such as steel. This includes providing the steel sector with over £285m of compensation since 2013 for the indirect costs due to the EU Emission Trading System, carbon price support mechanism, Renewable Obligation, and small-scale Feed-in Tariff.
The steel sector is actively engaged with UK Research and Innovation in shaping the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund: we are providing up to £66m for the âTransforming Foundation Industries Challengeâ, subject to industry co-funding. In addition, up to a further £170 million has been provided to develop a ânet-zero carbonâ industrial cluster, that will help heavy industries â including steel â to share expertise and innovate low-carbon solutions as we move to a greener, cleaner economy. We have also created an important new fund â the Industrial Energyâ¯Transformation Fund â which is worth up to £315 million, and supportsâ¯businesses with high energy useâ¯toâ¯transition to a low carbon future, and cut their billsâ¯in the process through increased energy efficiency. Recently, we have launched an informal consultation, and are seeking views and evidence on how we can design the fund to maximise its benefits whilst ensuring value for money.
The Government published information from departments, and their armâs length bodies, on the amount of steel procured over the last financial year, and the application of the steel procurement guidance. Departments have confirmed that, where applicable, the guidance for steel procurement has been fully complied with on major projects, and we will continue to work closely with these departments and armâs length bodies to improve procurement guidance awareness, and the quality of the informationâ¯provided. We have also published an update of the Steel Pipeline, signalling upcoming steel requirements for national infrastructure projects to UK producers and suppliers.
The Government has carefully considered the case for removing plant and machinery (P&M) from business rates valuations, but has decided against doing so. Most process P&M is not rateable, and removing service P&M from rating would mean exempting equipment which is integrated into buildings such as heating, lighting, and plumbing.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 239886
- Session
- 2017-19
- Subjects
- Finance Electricity Iron and steel Manufacturing industries Business rates Procurement Prices
- Link
- View this Written question on www.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2022-06-29 10:52:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2017-19/239886
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2017-19/239886
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2017-19/239886