Written question asked by Mike Wood (Conservative) on Thursday, 2 July 2026, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 6 July 2026. It was answered by Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour) on Friday, 10 July 2026 on behalf of the Cabinet Office.
Lord Mandelson
- Question
-
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, for what reason Matthew Doyle was asked to undertake supplementary due diligence on Lord Mandelson being appointed as Ambassador, and whether the nature of Mr Doyle’s relationship with Mandelson was (a) declared or (b) considered as a potential conflict of interest.
- Answer
-
I refer the Hon Member to the Government’s statement and release of information on 1st June, providing an update on the response to the Humble Address. The documents published in the first and second tranches contain the entirety of the documents the Government has available for disclosure, except those being withheld at the request of the Metropolitan police.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 15348
- Session
- 2026-27
- Subjects
- Conflict of interests Public appointments Mandelson, Lord Doyle, Lord
- Link
- View this Written question on www.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-07-10 15:11:25 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2026-27/15348
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2026-27/15348
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2026-27/15348