Written question asked by Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative) on Friday, 28 August 2026, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 2 September 2026. It was answered by Luke Pollard (Labour) on Monday, 14 September 2026 on behalf of the Ministry of Defence.
Armed Forces: Training
- Question
-
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the 2025 Strategic Defence Review, what progress he has made in delivering recommendation 19.
- Answer
-
The Strategic Defence Review (SDR) Recommendation 19 has three separate recommendations. Recommendation 19a relates to the revision of Defence policy for training and education within Joint Services Publication 822 (JSP 822). This was completed by 30 Jan 2026 in line with the SDR recommendation. The revision has provided a more flexible approach to the design of training and education, allowing the Military Commands the ability to adapt processes to support the incorporation of lessons, changes in technology and broader innovation in the delivery of training and education.
Work is progressing to understand the scope and deliver against recommendation 19b. The Defence Modelling and Simulation Centre is aligning with the National Armaments Directorate Group (NADG) to use their expertise to undertake this task. Work has already proceeded to identify key stakeholders across Defence. The focus is on ensuring that systems are integrated into an eco-system that can interoperate across the Military Commands.
To deliver 19c, an initial internal report on the review of current standards, qualifications, and in-house training was delivered in April 2026. A final report is currently expected in Autumn 2026. The review has already informed a number of improvements, including significant policy changes to support the expansion of accreditation opportunities across Defence. Publication of this policy is scheduled for October 2026. The review has also examined the role, governance and future operating model of the Defence Awarding Organisation, enabling it to focus on gaps in accreditation provision in line with Defence priorities. In addition, the review has used artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of available training data to assess the extent of alignment between military training, civilian qualifications and recognised standards. An AI-enabled mapping tool is also being piloted to undertake detailed forensic mapping of military training against civilian qualifications and standards; this capability has the potential to significantly reduce a complex process that can take months to complete, supporting the faster delivery of accreditation opportunities across Defence. This work is informing the implementation of Recommendation 19c and supporting the expansion of accreditation opportunities across Defence. Further detail will be available later in the year.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 22908
- Session
- 2026-27
- Related items
- Grouped for answer
- Yes
- Subjects
- Armed forces Training
- Link
- View this Written question on www.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-09-25 12:25:39 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2026-27/22908
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2026-27/22908
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/commons/2026-27/22908