Written question asked by Lord Roberts of Llandudno (Liberal Democrat) on Wednesday, 9 March 2016, in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 23 March 2016. It was answered by Lord Bates (Conservative) on Tuesday, 15 March 2016 on behalf of the Home Office.
Asylum: France
- Question
-
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the rationale behind their decision to appeal the judgment in R (on the application of ZAT and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Article 8 ECHR - Dublin Regulation - interface - proportionality) IJR [2016] UKUT 00061 (IAC).
- Answer
-
The Secretary of State for the Home Department’s (SSHD) rationale for appealing the judgment is that the Tribunal erred in law in making its decision. The Tribunal accepted that the issues in dispute in the case should be considered by the Court of Appeal and so granted the SSHD permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal on 29th January 2016.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- HL6863
- Session
- 2015-16
- Subjects
- Appeals Asylum Families European Convention on Human Rights EU law France Syria
- Link
- View this Written question on www.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2016-07-05 19:42:19 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2015-16/HL6863
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2015-16/HL6863
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2015-16/HL6863