Written question asked by Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench) on Monday, 3 October 2016, in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Monday, 17 October 2016. It was answered by Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative) on Wednesday, 12 October 2016 on behalf of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

British Indian Ocean Territory

Question: To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether the discussions with the government of the US over the extension of the 1966 agreement concerning the British Indian Ocean Territory will be followed by discussions with Mauritius over the future sovereignty of the Chagos Islands.

Answer: The Government is disappointed at recent action by Mauritius in seeking a UN General Assembly resolution requesting “an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on the legal consequences of the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965”. We believe this is an inappropriate use of the International Court of Justice advisory opinion mechanism and sets an unwelcome precedent for other bilateral disputes. Whilst we are disappointed that this item has been added to the UNGA agenda, we are pleased that discussions at UNGA will be deferred until at least June 2017 in order to allow for bilateral discussions with Mauritius. We are hopeful that we can reach an agreed way forward through such bilateral discussions.

Secondary information

Type: Written question
Reference: HL2040
Session: 2016-17
Subjects: British Indian Ocean Territory Mauritius Military bases Sovereignty USA
Link: View this Written question on www.parliament.uk