Parliamentary Search

Written question asked by Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat) on Wednesday, 20 September 2023, in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 4 October 2023. It was answered by Baroness Vere of Norbiton (Conservative) on Wednesday, 27 September 2023 on behalf of the Department for Transport.

Rolling Stock

Question

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Vere of Norbiton on 20 September (HL10070), whether, when a train is not provided or runs in reduced formation (such as having five carriages instead of ten), the revenue of the train provider is reduced proportionately; and whether there is provision for the train provider to pay liquidated damages to the train operator to compensate them for the reputational damage and for any compensation paid to passengers in such cases.

Answer

The Intercity Express Programme contracts requires the daily provision of trains of the correct formation to operate the planned timetable.

As there has been full transfer of delivery risk passed to the train supplier, when a train provided that is shorter than that planned there is a reduction in the lease charge.

The effect of this is that Hitachi will suffer the financial impact of these circumstances arising from the loss of income.

Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
HL10352
Session
2022-23
Related items
Intercity Express Programme: Rolling Stock
Wednesday, 20 September 2023
Written questions
House of Lords
Railways: Standards
Thursday, 26 October 2023
Written questions
House of Lords
Subjects
Contracts Compensation Railways Passengers Rolling stock
Link
View this Written question on www.parliament.uk