Written question asked by Lord Smith of Finsbury (Non-affiliated) on Wednesday, 18 May 2022, in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 1 June 2022. It was answered by Lord Grimstone of Boscobel (Conservative) on Monday, 30 May 2022 on behalf of the Department for International Trade.
Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership: Patents
- Question
-
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether UK negotiators will seek to protect patent attorneys' rights of representation before the Unified Patent Court during accession negotiations to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
- Answer
-
The Government cannot comment on the sensitive detail of live negotiations; however, accession will only take place on terms beneficial to the UK. The UK has a world leading intellectual property regime and will not sign trade deals that compromise it. The Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership sets clear and consistent rules for the intellectual property (IP) sector which will benefit UK businesses, attorneys, and consumers.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- HL351
- Session
- 2022-23
- Grouped for answer
- Yes
- Subjects
- Legal profession Patents Negotiations Unified Patent Court Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership
- Link
- View this Written question on www.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-04-20 17:06:34 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2022-23/HL351
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2022-23/HL351
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2022-23/HL351