Written question asked by Bishop of Durham (Bishops (affiliation)) on Wednesday, 8 February 2023, in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 22 February 2023. It was answered by Lord Murray of Blidworth (Conservative) on Tuesday, 21 February 2023 on behalf of the Home Office.
Asylum: Napier Barracks
- Question
-
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Murray of Blidworth on 6 December 2022 (HL3643), why they did not produce a statement of community involvement when the consultation on extending planning permission for the accommodation facility at Napier barracks was for this stated purpose.
- Answer
-
A Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) is normally used in the development of a Local Plan by a local planning authority. However, in the case of a change of use application which was the subject of the Special Development Order (SDO) then an SCI would generally not be required. It is for the developer to decide if they wish to submit an SCI which would usually provide a summary of who, when and how stakeholders had been engaged with. An SCI will not be produced as it is not a requirement of the SDO; however, we have sought to engage with the local community through correspondence and the provision of relevant information on the gov.uk website.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- HL5541
- Session
- 2022-23
- Related items
- Subjects
- Asylum Planning permission Temporary accommodation Napier Barracks
- Link
- View this Written question on www.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-10-16 09:20:53 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2022-23/HL5541
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2022-23/HL5541
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2022-23/HL5541