Skip to main content

1-20 of 271 results for subject:"Napier Barracks"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Home Affairs Committee
Date
14 July 2026
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty’s Government how, in expanding the use of large-scale sites for asylum accommodation, they will ensure that lessons learnt from the operation of Napier Barracks and the RAF Wethersfield sites will be applied to new facilities from the outset.

Asked by
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 cc646-8
House
House of Lords

In begging leave to ask the Question standing in my name on the Order Paper, I draw attention to my interest in that I am supported by the RAMP organisation.

Member
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c646
House
House of Lords

The Government are confident that the level of due diligence carried out on sites has improved since 2024 and that value-for-money assessments now take place at the appropriate stage. I can assure the noble Lord that lessons have been learned from large site acquisitions that occurred under the previous Government and are now being implemented to inform our future accommodation procurement.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c646
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that Answer. A previous Permanent Secretary to the Home Office told a Select Committee of the House of Commons that there were a thousand lessons to be learned. I am not going to ask the Minister to outline the answers to all those thousand lessons, but can I specifically ask him about the practice of transporting people long distances to Croydon and other places, simply to have video conferencing interviews? It is an absolute waste of money; surely provision could be provided on-site.

Asked by
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c646
House
House of Lords

One of the improvements that the Government intend to make is to ensure that interviews take place on-site. That is good for cost, for the people being interviewed and for the taxpayer as a whole.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c646
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister will be aware that the Government are proposing to spend over £1 million refurbishing the Cameron barracks in Inverness to house asylum seekers. Will he promise that there will be a similar amount of money to refurbish other barracks that are currently occupied by our soldiers?

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c647
House
House of Lords

I think the noble Baroness will know that the UK Government, with this Labour Party now as the prime mover, have invested a considerable amount of resource in improving accommodation for troops across the country, including the biggest-ever engagement in improving accommodation for service men and women in their communities. That is one thing we are trying to do. We are, at the moment, looking at Cameron barracks as one of the options. We are undertaking due diligence, and no final decisions have been taken. In the event of any decision being taken, we will make sure that the accommodation is up to a decent standard, which I think is only fair to those who are using it.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c647
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on the question of barracks, Crowborough barracks in East Sussex is routinely used for the Kent and Sussex Army Cadet Forces as well as the local school CCFs, but it seems that the Home Office will now be turfing them out and using the barracks for accommodation for asylum seekers. At the same time, the Government say they want to support young people. Do the Government really think that this is a good example of how to treat and invest in tomorrow’s UK citizens?

Asked by
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c647
House
House of Lords

As the noble Lord will know, we have announced that we wish to examine the opportunity for Crowborough barracks. We are under- taking due diligence at the moment. That involves discussions with a range of authorities, including the police, local authorities, the local health service and, indeed, the local Member of Parliament. No final decision has been taken as yet.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c647
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister agree with me that servicemen’s accommodation is in the terrible state it is in because the last Government privatised it?

Asked by
Lord Watts (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c647
House
House of Lords

I say to my noble friend what I said to the noble Baroness, Lady McIntosh of Pickering: this Labour Government have invested more money in servicepeople’s housing than any Government previously over the last few years. We have done that to upgrade housing that was left to go to wrack and ruin by the previous Government. I am proud of the fact that my colleagues in the Ministry of Defence have committed to that, have seen it through and are improving standards for service men and women across the country.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c647
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend the Minister will know my view that the best barracks for sailors are ships. I am sure he would agree that the way of getting around it from that side of life is that we should order as many ships as possible as quickly as possible. Does he agree with that?

Asked by
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c647
House
House of Lords

I am afraid these are turning into defence questions, but I shall do my best. I simply say to my noble friend that the previous Government did invest in putting people on ships; it was called the “Bibby Stockholm”. As a result of the failures of the “Bibby Stockholm” to provide a decent standard of accommodation, one of the first actions that this Government took was to scrap it and to provide better-quality accommodation for people who were arriving in this country in large numbers, largely as a result of the failure of the last Government to achieve stopping the boats in the first place.

Answered by
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
851 c648
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether it remains their intention to vacate the Napier Barracks site on or before 25 March.

Asked by
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2025
Reference
HL5770
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether refugee support organisations, in addition to Migrant Help, currently operate within Napier Barracks.

Asked by
Lord German (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
HL215
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what criteria and process will be used to determine whether a person seeking asylum is suitable to be accommodated at MDP Wethersfield; whether the criteria and process will be the same as those in her Department's Allocation of Accommodation policy...

Asked by
Alison Thewliss (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 September 2023
Reference
195535
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Murray of Blidworth on 6 December 2022 (HL3643), why they did not produce a statement of community involvement when the consultation on extending planning permission for the accommodation facility at Napier barracks was for this stated purpose.

Asked by
Bishop of Durham (Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 February 2023
Reference
HL5541
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government when they will publish a statement of community involvement following the consultation on extending planning permission for the accommodation facility at Napier Barracks.

Asked by
Bishop of Durham (Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2022
Reference
HL3643
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how many individuals were held in immigration detention at the (1) Dover, (2) Manston, and (3) Napier Barracks, immigration centres on the most recent dates for which data are available; and what is the normal capacity of each facility.

Asked by
Lord Hylton (Crossbench)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 December 2022
Reference
HL3600
House
House of Lords