Written question asked by Baroness Finn (Conservative) on Wednesday, 4 June 2025, in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 18 June 2025. It was answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour) on Wednesday, 18 June 2025 on behalf of the Cabinet Office.
Cabinet Office: KPMG
- Question
-
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 23 April (HL5835), whether they considered a bridging arrangement with an alternative supplier to KPMG before the extension of contract C2980; and if so, what assessment they made of value for money and risk when comparing the options of extending the contract and finding an alternative supplier.
- Answer
-
Alternatives to a short-term contract extension were considered, and the decision to pursue a short-term extension without an increase to the contract value was taken based on this providing best value for money and other considerations (for example system changes and interoperability) and constraints associated with a short-term bridging opportunity.
At the Spending Review the Cabinet Office secured funding from the Transformation Fund to begin the long-term transformation of the civil service model for learning and development.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- HL8106
- Session
- 2024-26
- Related items
- Subjects
- Contracts Cabinet Office KPMG
- Link
- View this Written question on www.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-09-05 23:17:51 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2024-25/HL8106
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2024-25/HL8106
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2024-25/HL8106