Skip to main content

Written question asked by Baroness Berger (Labour) on Monday, 20 July 2026, in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Monday, 3 August 2026. It was answered by Baroness Merron (Labour) on Friday, 4 September 2026 on behalf of the Department of Health and Social Care.


Health Hazards: Fire Resistant Materials

Question

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of evidence linking chemical flame retardants to developmental and neurological impacts in children.

Answer

The Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) has considered the available evidence for phosphate-based flame retardants (PFRs) and the potential for neurodevelopmental effects in children and the developing foetus. PFRs were introduced in the United Kingdom as an alternative to brominated flame retardants as some of these were banned from use or restricted.

The COT reviewed the potential for PFRs to act via similar mechanisms to organophosphate (OP) compounds, such as OP pesticides, as they have some structural similarities.

Overall, the COT concluded that the available evidence indicates that PFRs do not pose a risk of developmental toxicity at anticipated exposure levels and that PFRs were very unlikely to share the neurodevelopmental effects of other OP compounds. However, the COT could not exclude the possibility that PFRs could produce neurodevelopmental toxicity by some other mechanism. Further information is available in the COT’s Statement on phosphate-based flame retardants and the potential for neurodevelopmental toxicity, a copy of which is attached.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
HL2282
Session
2026-27
Attachment
Additional Document
Subjects
Children Chemicals Health hazards Fire resistant materials
Link
View this Written question on www.parliament.uk