Proceeding contribution from Stephen Metcalfe (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 27 June 2012. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Coryton Oil Refinery.
Coryton Oil Refinery
I entirely agree. There could have been a different outcome if there had been more openness and transparency on all sides. I do not attribute fault to anyone, but these events need to be looked at. That different outcome could have been more beneficial to the bond holders, but my primary concern is, and will continue to be, for the work force who will pay the price for this breakdown in communications.
For those unfamiliar with the refinery, I want to put it in historical context and explain its local importance. South Essex has a long and proud industrial heritage. At one time there were three refineries along the Thames. After PWC’s announcement, there will be none. When we talk about this refinery closing, we are not talking about just another business that got into trouble and failed to meet the challenges of the modern world. On the contrary, it was a very profitable business. It met the modern challenges. It was part of our collective DNA in south Essex. It was part of the very fabric of society there; people moved to work there. If it goes, the economic blow will have the biggest impact, however.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 547 c407
- Session
- 2012-13
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Essex Oil Refineries
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-11-28 15:09:39 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-06-27/12062776000645
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-06-27/12062776000645
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-06-27/12062776000645