Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Clappison (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 13 July 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Bill.


Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Bill

My hon. Friend is giving the House the benefit of a clear explanation of the difference between the two types of offences and what could be taken into account in determining how to prosecute. Does he agree that in order to avoid people casually letting out tenancies to friends, perhaps without great profit, and to maximise the deterrent effect on those who try to make a large profit by letting out tenancies, it should be made clear to tenants, on taking on the tenancy, that they will be committing a criminal offence and face the penalties in the Bill if they sub-let in the circumstances that it outlines?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
548 c637 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Fraud Social rented housing Tenants
Legislation
Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Bill 2012-13
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk