Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 25 January 2013. It occurred during Debate on bill on Offshore Gambling Bill.


Offshore Gambling Bill

That is a matter for debate. I would hope that there can be some flexibility in this regard. Tax is a matter for the Treasury, while the levy is a matter for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

As the levy already exists, there should not be a problem in extending it to overseas operators to equalise the conditions of competition so as not to generate a new state aid issue. If it is thought that the levy raises such an issue, the Gambling Commission has waited an incredibly long time to say so. The levy is not paid directly to economic operators in the field of horse racing but directly to the Horserace Betting Levy Board, which then distributes it for the improvement of horse racing as an industry, including veterinary science and education. Without the levy, it is hard to see what contribution bookmakers would make. The levy fell to a very low level, but it started to rise and now seems to have stabilised again.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
557 c585 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Betting Licensing Horse racing Gambling Taxation
Legislation
Offshore Gambling Bill 2012-13
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk