Proceeding contribution from Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 25 January 2013. It occurred during Debate on bill on Offshore Gambling Bill.
Offshore Gambling Bill
That is a matter for debate. I would hope that there can be some flexibility in this regard. Tax is a matter for the Treasury, while the levy is a matter for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
As the levy already exists, there should not be a problem in extending it to overseas operators to equalise the conditions of competition so as not to generate a new state aid issue. If it is thought that the levy raises such an issue, the Gambling Commission has waited an incredibly long time to say so. The levy is not paid directly to economic operators in the field of horse racing but directly to the Horserace Betting Levy Board, which then distributes it for the improvement of horse racing as an industry, including veterinary science and education. Without the levy, it is hard to see what contribution bookmakers would make. The levy fell to a very low level, but it started to rise and now seems to have stabilised again.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 557 c585
- Session
- 2012-13
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Betting Licensing Horse racing Gambling Taxation
- Legislation
- Offshore Gambling Bill 2012-13
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-05 12:15:00 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-01-25/13012550000140
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-01-25/13012550000140
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-01-25/13012550000140