Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Ian Davidson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 March 2013. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Scottish Referendum (Trident).


Scottish Referendum (Trident)

The Committee has made it clear that we believe that both sides in this debate—the Government and the various Ministries and those arguing for separation—should indicate much more openly than they have been willing to until now exactly how they intend to respond to various initiatives. In this case, having examined the matter in our report, we believe that the initiative now passes to those arguing for separation.

Our report is entitled “Days or decades?” because we believe that nuclear Trident could effectively be terminated in either days or decades. The onus now lies on the Scottish National party to clarify which it prefers. We

had a meeting with shop stewards from Coulport and Faslane this morning; Martin McCurley, Jim Conroy and Richie Calder are all here in the public gallery. I name them so that their management will know that they have actually turned up here.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
559 cc317-8WH 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Devolution Employment Nuclear weapons Referendums Location Nuclear disarmament Scotland NATO Scottish National Party Nuclear submarines Trident
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk