Proceeding contribution from Mark Field (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 April 2013. It occurred during Backbench debate and e-petition debate on Immigration (Bulgaria and Romania).
Immigration (Bulgaria and Romania)
My hon. Friend has made a robust case. I represent this area, which has two big hospitals— St Mary’s Paddington and Barts—that have had a significant problem with NHS tourism going back many decades. Does he not recognise that many doctors feel strongly about the Hippocratic oath, so they would be very reluctant to have any sort of pecking order, whether
of UK and non-UK citizens or EU citizens and others? Some of the problems he has identified therefore, real though they are, will be incredibly difficult to resolve. It is wrong to make too much of a party political point on the subject; yes, there have been problems, but I know St Mary’s Paddington has done a hell of a lot of work to get a lot of the money back, although significant NHS tourism is still unrecompensed.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 561 c192WH
- Session
- 2012-13
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Access Applications Benefits rules Bulgaria Administrative delays Borders Employment Housing Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants NHS Romania Visas EU immigration
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2022-04-17 17:24:22 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-22/13042245000008
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-22/13042245000008
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-22/13042245000008