Proceeding contribution from John Baron (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 20 November 2013. It occurred during Debate on bill on Defence Reform Bill.
Defence Reform Bill
I will very directly answer both those questions. I completely agree that the report the Government would submit would be subject to the scrutiny of this House and a vote, but the fact that the Secretary of State seems concerned about that points to a bigger story about the reforms. If the Government are concerned
that they might not carry the House as to the logic of their report, I suggest that that shows a weak point. I therefore suggest that the Secretary of State should, perhaps, not pursue that argument for too long, because for the Government not to accept this amendment because they are concerned they might not be able to carry the House tells a bigger story.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 570 c1271
- Session
- 2013-14
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Defence Contracts for services Defence equipment Procurement Reserve forces
- Legislation
- Defence Reform Bill 2013-14
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2018-02-07 16:56:51 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-20/13112092000199
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-20/13112092000199
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-20/13112092000199