Proceeding contribution from Julian Brazier (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 20 November 2013. It occurred during Debate on bill on Defence Reform Bill.
Defence Reform Bill
The hon. Members for Dunfermline and West Fife (Thomas Docherty) and for Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney (Mr Havard) are both good friends and
colleagues on the Defence Committee. However, may I suggest to the hon. Member for Dunfermline and West Fife that what he is saying just is not right? What the Reserves want is a strong voice of their own in a Regular-dominated process. That is exactly what new clause 1 would give them and the Government have agreed to that. What they do not want is what is in new clause 3. Proposed subsection (2) states:
“Further implementation of the plans shall be halted 40 days after the laying of the report”
unless there is a resolution of both Houses. That would put yet another level of uncertainty into their thinking.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 570 cc1296-7
- Session
- 2013-14
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Defence Contracts for services Defence equipment Procurement Reserve forces
- Legislation
- Defence Reform Bill 2013-14
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2018-02-07 16:56:56 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-20/13112092000385
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-20/13112092000385
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-20/13112092000385