Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Patrick Mercer (Independent (affiliation)) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 20 November 2013. It occurred during Debate on bill on Defence Reform Bill.


Defence Reform Bill

There we are: we see the opposing views of the two sides. All I ask is for the Secretary of State for Defence to be clear about it, and to continue to be clear about it. I find new clause 1 to be sensible; it has my complete support. New clause 3 posits some extremely interesting questions, and we have had a good debate about it this evening. However, I think that the point about the changing face of warfare is terribly important.

We have heard a lot of talk about cyber-warfare and other specialist forms of warfare. If we open our history books, we see that in the late 1920s there was a school of thought which held that the fighting of savage tribes could be done entirely from the air. That was tried by an emergent Royal Air Force in Wazirista, and it completely failed, because there were not the boots on the ground to support the Royal Air Force in the excellent work that it did.

Of course there are specialisations within the Reserve forces and the Territorial Army which are desperately important, but what our Regular forces depend on is a very high level of fitness, a very high level of training, and an ability to deploy instantly. One of my hon. Friends, who is no longer in the Chamber, observed that there was always a period of time before any Reservist—any Territorial—was up to snuff. That is no criticism, but, as Members who have served in infantry battalions know, preparing an individual for combat is akin to training a professional athlete. The level of fitness is extraordinarily important. I challenge any civilian holding down a full-time civilian job—and I do not say this with any form of disrespect—to be at such a level of fitness for instant deployment.

What we want for the future is the ability to nip problems in the bud—to avoid confrontation and conflict—and we therefore require deployment that is instantaneous, or as near to that as we can make it. I must say, with the greatest respect, that no Reservist can achieve that. It is not in the nature of Reserve forces. The clue is in the phrase “Reserve, not Regular”. I say that with profound respect for all Territorials and all Reservists, and for their naval and air force equivalents.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
570 c1301 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Defence Contracts for services Defence equipment Procurement Reserve forces
Legislation
Defence Reform Bill 2013-14
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk