Proceeding contribution from Malcolm Rifkind (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 13 October 2014. It occurred during Backbench debate on Palestine and Israel.
Palestine and Israel
No, I am sorry. I am afraid I cannot in the time available.
We are told that 135 members of the United Nations—many of which have relatively little connection with the middle east, although some have a great connection—have recognised Palestine as a state. That has had no effect. It has received 24 hours of publicity but has had no marginal, massive or significant impact on the course of history. There is a great risk that today we will make ourselves feel important and that our own frustration will lead us to vote for a motion that will not have the desired effect and will perhaps make the problems that need to be addressed in reaching a two-state solution more difficult to deal with.
I will not detain the House any further, but will simply say that symbolism sometimes has a purpose and sometimes has a role, but one does not recognise a state that does not yet have the fundamental ingredients that a state requires if it is to carry out its international functions. At the very least, I would respectfully suggest that the motion is premature.
6.6 pm
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 586 cc66-7
- Session
- 2014-15
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Borders Recognition of states Palestinian Authority Israel Palestine Peace negotiations Gaza Occupied territories
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2022-08-30 18:17:06 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-10-13/14101329000012
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-10-13/14101329000012
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-10-13/14101329000012