Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Malcolm Rifkind (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 13 October 2014. It occurred during Backbench debate on Palestine and Israel.


Palestine and Israel

No, I am sorry. I am afraid I cannot in the time available.

We are told that 135 members of the United Nations—many of which have relatively little connection with the middle east, although some have a great connection—have recognised Palestine as a state. That has had no effect. It has received 24 hours of publicity but has had no marginal, massive or significant impact on the course of history. There is a great risk that today we will make ourselves feel important and that our own frustration will lead us to vote for a motion that will not have the desired effect and will perhaps make the problems that need to be addressed in reaching a two-state solution more difficult to deal with.

I will not detain the House any further, but will simply say that symbolism sometimes has a purpose and sometimes has a role, but one does not recognise a state that does not yet have the fundamental ingredients that a state requires if it is to carry out its international functions. At the very least, I would respectfully suggest that the motion is premature.

6.6 pm


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
586 cc66-7 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Borders Recognition of states Palestinian Authority Israel Palestine Peace negotiations Gaza Occupied territories
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk