Proceeding contribution from Dominic Grieve (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 June 2016. It occurred during Debate on bill on Investigatory Powers Bill.
Investigatory Powers Bill
I am again most grateful to the Minister. I entirely accept that if he can produce, for example, an assurance before the passage of this Bill through Parliament that there will be a protocol in place—which we, for example, have access to—that sets out exactly how the process will be managed in practice and that we can provide the House with the reassurance that that is being followed, that would satisfy my concerns.
However, I do think there is an issue here, because frankly the world is made up of more and more bulk personal datasets, largely being collected in digital form, and there needs to be a process in place to ensure that what is there is legitimately held and is not just being added to in a way that could be outside Ministers’ line of vision altogether, unless they specifically started asking questions. That is the sort of approach I am talking about, so on that basis I am happy to accept the Minister’s assurance.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 611 c1064
- Session
- 2016-17
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Databases Electronic surveillance Intelligence services National security Privacy Investigatory Powers Commissioner
- Legislation
- Investigatory Powers Bill 2015-16 to 2016-17
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2017-02-20 10:18:04 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-06-07/16060732000199
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-06-07/16060732000199
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-06-07/16060732000199