Proceeding contribution from Justin Tomlinson (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 January 2017. It occurred during Debate on Soft Drinks Industry Levy: Funding for Sport in Schools.
Soft Drinks Industry Levy: Funding for Sport in Schools
Actually, that was the very first time I rebelled—I was rewarded by sitting on some obscure European committees thing for five years to think carefully about my actions. The funding was not scrapped. There was a change and initially a proposal to remove the ring-fencing, but the money was then once again ring-fenced, though schools were allowed to choose how to spend it on sports-related programmes. I supported that because we have got some fantastic school sport partnerships that are still thriving today—including my local one—but there were also some pretty poor ones, which have gone by the wayside, and those schools have now spent that money on individual sports coaches, sports clubs and things like that. We got there in the end, and funding has increased in this area since 2010.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 619 c33WH
- Session
- 2016-17
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Finance Schools Taxation Sports Sugar Exercise Soft drinks
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-08-13 13:19:02 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-01-10/17011062000014
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-01-10/17011062000014
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-01-10/17011062000014