Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Chris Leslie (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 12 December 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.


European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Exactly. People voting in the referendum might have been moved by that slogan “take back control”, but I do not honestly think many voters thought that that meant taking back control from a European Executive and handing it to Ministers of the Crown, outwith the powers and scope of Parliament to do much about it, yet that is effectively the proposal in clause 7.

I want to emphasise that this is not simply an exercise in transposing technical and necessary measures. The Government have extended the scope of the Bill into policy-making capability, which brings in the question of divergence. We have heard a lot recently about concepts of full alignment and this notion of diverging from rules and policies. The way clauses 7 and 9 have been drafted would allow Ministers, by order, through negative statutory instruments that we rarely get the chance even to vote on in this place, to make policy changes that could affect policy functions and the rights of our constituents—perhaps as part of a deregulating agenda—if that is indeed what the Government of the day sought to achieve.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
633 cc215-6 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Animal welfare Crimes of violence Delegated legislation Women Equality Human rights Environment protection EU law Ministerial powers Protection Parliamentary scrutiny Politics and government Refugees Trade Henry VIII clauses Brexit Dublin regulations
Legislation
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill 2017-19
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk