Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Chris Leslie (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 12 December 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.


European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

I suspect that the European Commission and the Republic of Ireland Government saw the phrase “full alignment” and thought that full alignment meant full alignment. It turns out from the Prime Minister’s statement yesterday that full alignment does not quite mean full alignment. She said it only meant aligning the areas in the Good Friday agreement protocol, but of course that predates the notion of our leaving the single market and the customs union, so the Good Friday agreement did not cover such narrow issues—I say that sarcastically—as goods and manufacture trade. The list of issues that she thinks full alignment covers does not include trade in goods, which is a staggering thing, because of course if we do not cover trade in goods, we end up with that hard border, which is absolutely the point we have got to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
633 c216 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Animal welfare Crimes of violence Delegated legislation Women Equality Human rights Environment protection EU law Ministerial powers Protection Parliamentary scrutiny Politics and government Refugees Trade Henry VIII clauses Brexit Dublin regulations
Legislation
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill 2017-19
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk