Proceeding contribution from Robert Neill (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 5 June 2019. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Rehabilitation of Offenders.
Rehabilitation of Offenders
I am grateful to the Minister for giving way, and I appreciate his reassurance that the test is of necessity. Can he assure me that the same approach is intended to be taken by the chairman of the inquiry, as, for example, will be taken by a judge in determining the test of necessity and also relevance to the topic matter of an inquiry? Relevance is the normal test in court. Can he assure us that necessity will include that as well?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 661 c173
- Session
- 2017-19
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Criminal records Inquiries Human rights Exemptions Offenders Protection Rehabilitation Vetting
- Legislation
- Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Order 1975 (Amendment) (England and Wales) Order 2019
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2021-07-30 15:24:00 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-06-05/190605100000031
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-06-05/190605100000031
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-06-05/190605100000031