Skip to main content

Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by Andrew Gwynne (Labour). It was answered on Thursday, 19 November 2020 on behalf of the Department for International Trade.


UK Trade Policy: US Presidential Election

Question

If the Secretary of State’s global Britain is to mean anything, we must not put all our eggs in one basket. I think it fair to say that, in recent times, the Secretary of State has bet everything on securing a trade deal with the Trump Administration. She might want to conclude a deal with Canada, but the Prime Minister there said that the Secretary of State had lacked the “bandwidth” to focus on getting a deal with his country. Does she intend to ignore that criticism and continue making a deal with the US her dominant priority? If so, what confidence does she have that the Biden Administration will feel the same way in terms of their own priorities for trade?

Answer

We have now secured trade deals with 52 countries. We have secured a deal with Japan that goes beyond and above the EU’s agreements, we are working on accession to the trans-Pacific partnership and we are negotiating with Australia and New Zealand, so we are by no means entirely focused on the US, but it is our largest single country trading partner. I am always struck by the anti-Americanism among Opposition Members. They simply do not understand that these deals are incredibly important for British business. As for the comments from overseas Governments on our trade negotiations, it is interesting that Labour Members simply like to repeat their “lines to take”. Maybe they need to think of some of their own ideas.


Secondary information

Type
Oral question
Reference
684 c449 
Session
2019-21
Oral question type
1st Supplementary
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Elections Trade USA
Link
View this Oral question on hansard.parliament.uk