Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 5 December 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.
Financial Services Bill
My Lords, I support some of the sentiments, but not the Amendment, of the noble Lords, Lord Barnett and Lord Peston. Like them, I believe it would be a good thing if Mr Carney were to appear before the Lords Economic Affairs Committee as well as the Commons Treasury Committee. Mr Carney is entirely used to dealing with bicameral legislatures with separate committees. On 30 October this year, he appeared before the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance to discuss the October monetary policy report. The following day, he appeared before the Canadian Senate Standing Committee on Banking, Trade, and Commerce to discuss the same report.
However, since this is a suggestion from the noble Lords, Lord Barnett and Lord Peston, I know they would prefer me to use the word “must” rather than “may”, but it may be better to suggest to the Minister not that Mr Carney must appear before our Economic Affairs Committee but that he may want to appear. The Minister may want to suggest this to him.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 741 c672
- Session
- 2012-13
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Bank of England Governing bodies Financial Policy Committee Financial services Financial institutions Regulation
- Legislation
- Financial Services Bill 2010-12 to 2012-13
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-11-26 10:38:23 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-12-05/12120569000086
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-12-05/12120569000086
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-12-05/12120569000086