Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 July 2017. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices.


Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices

My Lords, I think it is apparent that this side of the House would not agree with the Minister’s throwaway line that,

“the system is working quite well”.

That is not the theme of the report. Nor is it true, if one looks at manifold evidence from public opinion polls, that job security is not prevalent as an issue and a worry for almost all classes of worker. It is being

economical with the truth to make generalisations about workers preferring casual hours to guaranteed hours. There may be some people—students are a good example, out of term time or even in it in some cases—who prefer such hours, but does the Minister accept that you cannot get a mortgage on a zero-hours contract? Has the Minister done any research on whether that is true? If not, will he do some research and let the House know, perhaps in a letter? Is it possible to get a mortgage on a zero-hours contract? If it is not, does that not mean that we live in a two-class society—with different types of contract of employment —in respect of one of people’s most vital needs: to be able to get a mortgage, with those on such contracts falling away financially from people who are able to buy a house?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
783 cc1169-1170 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Minimum wage Self-employed Gig economy Modern Working Practices Review
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk