Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 July 2020. It occurred during Debate on bill on Business and Planning Bill.


Business and Planning Bill

My Lords, Amendment 55 tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Doocey, and the noble Lord, Lord Redesdale, seeks to alter the package travel regulations in a manner similar to the amendment tabled in Committee. The noble Baroness is right to identify the difficulties facing the UK tourism sector, in particular the many SMEs in the sector. It is therefore right that we do all we can to support this sector through the crisis.

On 3 June, we announced a £10 million kick-starting tourism package, which will give small businesses in tourist destinations grants of up to £5,000 to help them adapt following the pandemic. As of last week, the VAT rate applied to most tourism and hospitality-related activities has been cut from 20% to 5% for six months to help the sector get back on its feet. We have launched the “enjoy summer safely” national marketing campaign to encourage British people to enjoy UK tourism. Ministers and officials have been meeting representatives from the tourism sector regularly via the Tourism Industry Emergency Response Group. We are actively considering all the recovery ideas suggested to us by stakeholders, including schemes to promote domestic tourism.

In that spirit, I would like to follow this up by arranging a meeting with the sector representatives that the noble Baroness, Lady Doocey, has met to explore the points she has made about domestic tourism and package travel. I hope that offer is welcome. As confirmed in Committee, the Government have indicated that we will undertake a further review of the package travel recommendations. As these are EU laws, this review is better conducted when the transition period with the EU is over. I say that with some emphasis, as the EU Commission has recently commenced infraction proceedings against several member states that have amended laws in contravention of the package travel directive.

It is also important to reflect, as the noble Baroness recognised, on the balance to strike between business flexibility and consumer protection, so it is important to consult a wider range of interests. For the reasons I have given, I am not able to accept this amendment, and I hope the noble Baroness feels able to withdraw it.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
804 cc2027-8 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Disability Alcoholic drinks Age Anti-social behaviour Banks Construction Beer Debt collection Cafes Digital technology Industrial relations Licensing Furniture Licensed premises Glass Local government Ministerial powers Planning permission Planning Opening hours Listed buildings Public houses Licensing laws Loans Parish and town councils Noise Proof of identity Pedestrian areas Pedestrians Mayoral development corporations Package holidays Travel Sales Working hours Safety Urban development corporations Tourism Restaurants Unfair practices Smoking Transport for London Seating Video conferencing Coronavirus Hospitality industry Bounce back loan scheme Age assurance
Legislation
Business and Planning Bill 2019-21
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk