Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Friday, 18 November 2022. It occurred during Debate on bill on House of Lords (Peerage Nominations) Bill [HL].


House of Lords (Peerage Nominations) Bill [HL]

I thank my noble friend. Clearly, the process of encouraging appropriate resignations, making use of the leave of absence provisions and the various changes that have been made to the way that we run this House in recent years, can indeed be useful. I am sure that, in further discussion of the Bill, some of these possibilities will be considered.

I come to the final point. The Prime Minister is ultimately responsible to Parliament and the people for any nominations that he, or she in the past, makes to this House, and the Government do not see the case for changing this. However, the Government consider that the House of Lords Appointments Commission performs its role well, as it is currently constituted, and is extremely grateful for the work that it does. The fact that Members of this House are appointed from a wide range of backgrounds is testament to its success. It will, and should, continue to advise on appointments in the same way that it does now. However, as will be apparent, the Government have reservations about the Bill we have debated today, and I look forward to hearing further from my noble friend.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
825 c1127 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information House of Lords House of Lords composition House of Lords Appointments Commission Prime Minister Public appointments Political parties Life peers Party leaders Crossbenchers
Legislation
House of Lords (Peerage Nominations) Bill (HL) 2022-23
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk