Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 January 2023. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Trade (Australia and New Zealand) Bill.


Trade (Australia and New Zealand) Bill

Before the noble Lord sits down, can I ask him about his reassurance to the noble Lord, Lord Lennie, on Amendment 1? He said we need not worry about Clause 1(2) because Clause 1(1) can be used only in cases arising from these two trade agreements. I think I follow the Minister’s

argument—until I turn to Clause 2. Clause 2 seems extremely permissive and says one can make provision, general or specific, or

“make provision for different purposes or areas”.

Can the Minister expand on his assurance to the noble Lord, Lord Lennie, and assure me that the Bill as a whole, not just Clause 1(2), cannot be used for purposes other than to deal with cases arising as a result of the two free trade agreements?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
827 cc33-4 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Animal welfare Agriculture Climate change Devolution Australia Environment protection Food Import controls NHS Ministerial powers Public sector Procurement New Zealand Small businesses Safety Trade agreements Trade competitiveness Impact assessments
Legislation
Trade (Australia and New Zealand) Bill 2022-23
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk