Proceeding contribution from Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 18 June 2025. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Employment Rights Bill.
Employment Rights Bill
I hear what the Minister says, but surely she would agree that, if one looks at Amendment 273F, which moves from having “a balance of probabilities” to “beyond reasonable doubt”, if you are taking forward an LME infraction case beyond reasonable doubt, you are more likely to succeed, and the corollary of that is that you are not taking forward cases on which you have a paucity of evidence. So, with all due respect to the noble Baroness, I disagree. If you are bringing in proportionality and “beyond reasonable doubt”, you are going to have sharper cases that tackle the most egregious examples of infractions of the legislation and do not waste a lot of time—and consequently save the taxpayer money.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 846 c2042
- Session
- 2024-26
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Criminal investigation Costs Employment Tribunals Service Enforcement Legal aid scheme Legal opinion Holiday leave Powers of entry Pay Powers Workplace pensions Migrant workers Slavery Time limits Underpayments Information sharing Fair Work Agency
- Legislation
- Employment Rights Bill 2024-26
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-09-05 23:19:13 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2025-06-18/25061864000039
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2025-06-18/25061864000039
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2025-06-18/25061864000039