Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 February 2026. It occurred during Debate on bill on Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill.


Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill

My Lords, I will speak in support of the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Patel; I thank him for the

background research he has done on the amendment. The Minister will be aware that I work for the Dispensing Doctors’ Association. My father and brother were GPs and my uncle was a surgeon; I could not stand the sight of blood, so for the greater good I went into the legal profession instead.

The Minister and the noble Baroness, Lady Blake, sitting beside her, know of my interest in this subject, particularly in relation to junior doctors in training. As we have heard, they do not have a sufficient number of specialty job vacancies offered to them, and they have no security of tenure. They are of an age—probably in their late 20s and early 30s—when they would hope to put down roots, form relationships and start families. It is particularly key that we look after them.

I had one point of difference from the noble Lord, Lord Patel: I thought the consultants were quite well rewarded in their pay round. I hope they will support the junior doctors in their pay round, because it is very important that the profession sticks together in that regard. I agree with the noble Lord that it is very unfortunate if they feel they have to go on strike, which obviously disadvantages patients, hospitals and other staff.

When the Minister responds to the debate, can she explain to me what there is in the Bill, if we do not adopt this amendment, to cover the specific set of circumstances that the noble Lord has identified? If there is nothing in the Bill, will she come forward at Third Reading with something that covers these points? This exercises a number of us very deeply. We have to give the right message, particularly to young, male, white doctors, who may otherwise leave the profession. In general practice, a number of partners are leaving and going to work in Australia, New Zealand and Canada after they have completed their training and possibly after five or 10 years of experience. For the future of the profession at every level, we need to take this set of circumstances very seriously.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
853 cc437-8 
Session
2024-26
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Graduates Resident doctors NHS Recruitment Parliamentary scrutiny Medicine Refugees Migrant workers Training
Legislation
Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill 2024-26
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk