Proceeding contribution from Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 15 July 2026. It occurred during Debate on bill on Sporting Events Bill [HL].
Sporting Events Bill [HL]
My Lords, we come to a little triumvirate of amendments standing in my name. To take them in order, we start with the infrastructure requirements for providing any games or championship. I will not go over old ground, but I would like some assurance from the Minister about what process the Government expect to follow to make sure we get the infrastructure right. There are certain models, such as the London Olympic Games, when a great deal of infrastructure was put in; but then, with the Birmingham and Glasgow Commonwealth Games, we did not have to do much. If building has to be done, what is the process for getting assurances on it?
Then we come to what I think is my favourite of the three amendments: on getting some benefit down to grass-roots sports. This is inspired by our experience during the London Olympics, because the one thing we did not do was encourage people to play sport. We learned how to build lovely things and how to watch sport, but we did not get people to play. We thought that just watching and having a good example would be enough—it is not. There are other examples where we have been more successful, such as in championships. There is a great deal of competition between netball and rugby union regarding which has been most successful in encouraging back people who had had some training but fell out of the sport. Basically, it needs a targeted approach. What are we doing to make sure that grass-roots sports benefit directly from this activity? That is the question we are raising here.
Then we come to the thorny question of broadcasting. What are we doing to make sure that people can actually watch an event, particularly if it is one of ours, and particularly if the Government have put in money, time and energy. What are we doing to make sure that people who cannot get tickets can still watch? I could have used the term “free to air”, but I would be pulled up on it: “Ah, but you need to pay the licence fee to get it on the BBC”. I am referring to something that is not hiding behind a paywall. Are we making sure that people notice these events and can feel included, even if they are not actually there, and can obtain some benefit from them?
I hope that the Minister will have positive, reassuring answers on these amendments, so that we can take them forward for future events. I doubt very much that she will inspire me to vote again, but I hope I will get positive answers. I look forward to her reply.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 858 c675
- Session
- 2026-27
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Charities Broadcasting Advertising Climate change Finance Environment protection Gambling Infrastructure Ministerial powers Protection Parliamentary scrutiny Marketing Transport Small businesses Sportsgrounds Sports Retail trade Touting Street trading Street cleaning Tickets Sponsorship Information sharing Zero hours contracts
- Legislation
- Sporting Events Bill (HL) 2026-27
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-07-16 11:36:38 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-07-15/26071547000070
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-07-15/26071547000070
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-07-15/26071547000070