Skip to main content

1-20 of 31 results for house:"House of Lords"

Answering member X
Baroness Hayman
Subject X
Fees and charges

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Hayman, Baroness (31)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Fees and charges (31)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Whether the fees to be paid by merchants and saddlers for registration in 2001-2 with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain under the Medicines (Exemptions for Merchants in Veterinary Drugs) Order 1998 have been determined. [HL 316].

Asked by
Lord Tomlinson (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 2001
Reference
HL 316; 620 c124WA
House
House of Lords

What has been, for the most convenient recent year for which information is available, the total government expenditure in the United Kingdom on sea defences and main river works, indicating how the expenditure has been financed; the proportion of total expenditure financed by drainage rates; and on whom drainage rates...

Asked by
Lord Marlesford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 June 2000
Reference
614 c16-7WA; HL 2767
House
House of Lords

Why Members of Parliament should be charged the sum of £30 when lodging an objection to the introduction of a genetically modified crop with the Dept of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. [HL 2139].

Asked by
Lord Beaumont of Whitley (Other (affiliation))
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 May 2000
Reference
HL 2139; 613 c10-1WA
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the economics of agriculture within the United Kingdom. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Palmer
Answering member
Baroness Hayman
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
8 March 2000
Reference
610 c1088-148
House
House of Lords
Further to their response to the report of the Meat Industry Red Tape Working Group, how they propose to prevent widespread closure of small and medium-sized abattoirs and cutting plants, and give confidence to their owners and to the wider farming community.
Asked by
Countess of Mar (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
6 March 2000
Reference
610 c796-7
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Hayman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 March 2000
Reference
610 c796-7
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Hayman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 March 2000
Reference
610 c796-7
House
House of Lords

Whether the proposed increase of 60 per cent in the maximum levy chargeable by the Milk Development Council is justifiable in the present state of farming; and whether they will ask the National Audit Office to examine the finances of the council. [HL 1102].

Asked by
Lord Hylton (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 2000
Reference
610 c57WA; HL 1102
House
House of Lords

Whether agriculture and health Ministers have determined the fees to be paid by merchants and saddlers for registration in 2000-01 with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain under the Medicines (Exemptions for Merchants in Veterinary Drugs) Order 1998. [HL 452]. - Includes table.

Asked by
Lord Hughes of Woodside (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 1999
Reference
HL 452; 608 c65WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they have yet made a decision about the level of Meat Hygiene Service charges in 1999-2000. [HL 210]. - Inc figures.

Asked by
Lord Graham of Edmonton (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 December 1999
Reference
607 c82WA; HL 210
House
House of Lords

Whether, owing to the difficulties experienced by the Meat Hygiene Service in recruiting official veterinary officers to service abattoirs in remote areas, it is fair that some small abattoirs should be required to pay a higher hourly rate for their official veterinary surgeons, plus travelling time, than abattoirs in more...

Asked by
Lord Stanley of Alderley (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 October 1999
Reference
HL 3102; 605 c36WA
House
House of Lords

Whether Forms CRU100 (Certificates of Recoverable Benefits) issued to commercial insurers by the compensation recovery unit of the Benefits Agency prior to 5 April 1999 preclude the recovery of NHS fees, where these have been incurred, under the terms of the Road Traffic (NHS Charges) Act 1999. [HL 3538].

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 1999
Reference
HL 3538; 604 c14-7WA
House
House of Lords

Whether National Health Service trusts and commercial insurers are experiencing any difficulties with the interpretation and operation of the Road Traffic (NHS Charges) Act 1999 in the context of their dealings with the compensation recovery unit of the Benefits Agency. [HL 3537].

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 1999
Reference
HL 3537; 604 c17WA
House
House of Lords

Whether the computer system commissioned for use by the compensation recovery unit of the Benefits Agency under the remit conferred by the Road Traffic (NHS Charges) Act 1999 is fully operational; and if so, on what date it was deemed to be so. [HL 3535].

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 1999
Reference
HL 3535; 604 c17WA
House
House of Lords

Whether the compensation recovery unit of the Benefits Agency has a complement of staff sufficient to meet its full responsibilities under the Road Traffic (NHS Charges) Act 1999; and whether all such staff have been fully trained to operate the system for recovering charges on behalf of National Health Service...

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 1999
Reference
HL 3536; 604 c17WA
House
House of Lords

How many payments to National Health Service trusts were made by the compensation recovery unit of the Benefits Agency under the terms of the Road Traffic (NHS Charges) Act 1999 during the three months to 30 June; and what was the aggregate value of those payments. [HL 3534].

Asked by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 1999
Reference
HL 3534; 604 c17-8WA
House
House of Lords

Statement on what plans they have to increase National Health Service charges. [HL 1259]. - Includes figures and ref to details of the revised charges in Library.

Asked by
Lord Clarke of Hampstead (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 February 1999
Reference
597 c148-9WA; HL 1259
House
House of Lords

Further to the Written Answers by the Baroness Jay of Paddington on 3 June at 591 c36WA and 25 June at 591 c44-5WA what conclusions they have come to from their consideration of the cases of Decker and Kohll in the European Court of Justice, which concern the rights of...

Asked by
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 1998
Reference
HL 169; 595 c80WA
House
House of Lords

Statement on whether they will publish the report of the review of aspects of surrogacy arrangements announced in June 1997. [HL3414]. - Inc announcement that report is being published today as Cm 4068 (in Lib).

Asked by
Baroness Gould of Potternewton (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 October 1998
Reference
593 c101-2WA
House
House of Lords

Statement announcing publication of consultation paper on proposals to institute the change to a tonnage based levy for statutory waste disposal authorities. [HL 2494].

Asked by
Lord Gregson (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 1998
Reference
HL 2494; 591 c145-6WA
House
House of Lords