1-17 of 17 results for subject:Technology
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.279 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Technology
- We searched for
- subject_t:Technology OR subject_t:"Applied science" OR subject_t:"High technology" OR subject_ses:93220
Answering member
X
Lord Mandelson
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
More
Mandelson, Lord (17)
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
My Lords, science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills are crucial in securing future prosperity. Last summer, I asked universities to provide an additional 10,000 places on courses that contribute most to our high-level skills needs, including STEM subjects. All of these places have been filled. Higher Ambitions, the Government’s higher education framework, will deliver further skills needed for new industry and new jobs, notably in STEM subjects.
My Lords, science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills are crucial in securing future prosperity. Last summer, I asked universities to provide an additional 10,000 places on courses that contribute most to our high-level skills needs, including STEM subjects. All of these places have been filled. Higher Ambitions, the Government’s higher education framework, will deliver further skills needed for new industry and new jobs, notably in STEM subjects.
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Asked by
Baroness Prosser
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills what action he is taking to give priority to STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) at higher education level in the light of the possibility of spending cuts affecting universities.
My Lords, on behalf of my noble friend Lady Wall, and at her request, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in her name on the Order Paper.
Subjects
Finance; Higher education; Engineering; Universities; Technology; Science; Mathematics
Date
21 January 2010
Reference
716 c1100
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, universities are aware of the Government's requirement for that rebalancing, and for them to grow their intake at a pace and on a scale for which the resources exist to support it. We have always made that clear. However, tighter budgets right across the public sector, including in higher education, can be a spur to further diversifying British universities' funding. That can also focus minds on teaching and research excellence, and on new ways of delivering higher education. Those trends are already part of the picture in higher education; both trends need to become more so in the coming years.
My Lords, universities are aware of the Government's requirement for that rebalancing, and for them to grow their intake at a pace and on a scale for which the resources exist to support it. We have always made that clear. However, tighter budgets right across the public sector, including in higher education, can be a spur to further diversifying British universities' funding. That can also focus minds on teaching and research excellence, and on new ways of delivering higher education. Those trends are already part of the picture in higher education; both trends need to become more so in the coming years.
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Asked by
Baroness Garden of Frognal
(Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, the recent HEFCE grant letter showed a reduction in unit funding for teaching of around £200 per student, with a figure of £3,950 for 2010-11. Would the Secretary of State indicate whether that is a one-off measure linked to the current economic climate and the need to rebalance the books, following the overspend in student support, or is that rebalancing likely to continue next year? Also, is the cut across the board and will it therefore impact on those students studying STEM subjects and other subjects?
Subjects
Finance; Higher education; Engineering; Universities; Technology; Science; Mathematics
Date
21 January 2010
Reference
716 c1101
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Government are investing in encouraging more young people to take up and study science. We are working with schools to promote interest in, and the study of, STEM subjects; and we are opening up opportunities in universities and beyond. I am glad to say that the uptake of STEM subjects at GCSE and A-level has been rising steadily since 2005. The Government announced a £140 million strategy in January 2008 to secure the next generation of scientists and mathematicians, and provide more and better STEM teachers. This is exactly the sort of investment that we must sustain, and exactly the sort of investment that would be in peril should those in the party opposite have the opportunity to make the swingeing cuts that they are already alluding to.
My Lords, the Government are investing in encouraging more young people to take up and study science. We are working with schools to promote interest in, and the study of, STEM subjects; and we are opening up opportunities in universities and beyond. I am glad to say that the uptake of STEM subjects at GCSE and A-level has been rising steadily since 2005. The Government announced a £140 million strategy in January 2008 to secure the next generation of scientists and mathematicians, and provide more and better STEM teachers. This is exactly the sort of investment that we must sustain, and exactly the sort of investment that would be in peril should those in the party opposite have the opportunity to make the swingeing cuts that they are already alluding to.
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Asked by
Baroness Prosser
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, I trust that my noble friend is aware that there is considerable support, particularly on these Benches, for the views that he expressed yesterday in his article in the Guardian about the future of university funding. Will he reassure the House that the Government will continue to work to encourage young people, and more women, to take science, technology, engineering and mathematics courses at colleges and universities? We know that such courses open the door to STEM-related careers. Will he further tell the House what he is doing to strengthen the ties between research and business?
Subjects
Finance; Higher education; Engineering; Universities; Technology; Science; Mathematics
Date
21 January 2010
Reference
716 c1100-1
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, this is pure hyperbole. In reality, the savings that we have set out amount to a reduction of under 5 per cent over the next three years. The Government have made it clear that higher education needs to shoulder its fair share of the burden of reductions in public spending-but not more than its fair share. I will make sure that that remains the case.
My Lords, this is pure hyperbole. In reality, the savings that we have set out amount to a reduction of under 5 per cent over the next three years. The Government have made it clear that higher education needs to shoulder its fair share of the burden of reductions in public spending-but not more than its fair share. I will make sure that that remains the case.
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Baker of Dorking
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, is the Minister aware that the number of applications by young people to go to universities this year is already 12 per cent higher than last year? Few of those extra people will go to universities. Every vice-chancellor now agrees that there will be a fall in numbers as a result of his cuts. Sarkozy increases higher education expenditure, Mandelson cuts it. How does he reconcile that with the theme of the election, which is investment in the future, and hope and aspiration for the young?
Subjects
Finance; Higher education; Engineering; Universities; Technology; Science; Mathematics
Date
21 January 2010
Reference
716 c1101
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills what action he is taking to give priority to STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) at higher education level in the light of the possibility of spending cuts affecting universities.
My Lords, on behalf of my noble friend Lady Wall, and at her request, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in her name on the Order Paper.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills what action he is taking to give priority to STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) at higher education level in the light of the possibility of spending cuts affecting universities.
My Lords, on behalf of my noble friend Lady Wall, and at her request, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in her name on the Order Paper.
Asked by
Baroness Prosser
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Procedure
Secretary of State's questions (HL)
For answer on
21 January 2010
Answered on
21 January 2010
My Lords, science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills are crucial in securing future prosperity. Last summer, I asked universities to provide an additional 10,000 places on courses that contribute most to our high-level skills needs, including STEM subjects. All of these places have been filled. Higher Ambitions, the Government’s higher education framework, will deliver further skills needed for new industry and new jobs, notably in STEM subjects.
Notes
Question asked on behalf of Baroness Wall of New Barnet.
Subjects
Finance; Higher education; Engineering; Universities; Technology; Science; Mathematics
Date
21 January 2010
Reference
716 c1100
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Statement on what actions he will take to ensure that Science and Technology issues are taken into account in the work of government departments.
Statement on what actions he will take to ensure that Science and Technology issues are taken into account in the work of government departments.
Asked by
Phyllis Starkey
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
10 December 1998
For answer on
14 December 1998
Answered on
14 December 1998
Dr. Starkey: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what actions he will take to ensure that Science and Technology
issues are taken into account in the work of Government Departments. [64081]
Mr. Mandelson: I am today announcing a new group of Ministers who will have responsibility for supporting me in delivering my
responsibility for science, engineering and technology across Government. I am looking to the new group to build on the work of the
Ministerial Foresight Group--driving forward the Foresight Programme will be at the top of its agenda-- and to ensure that the
Government takes full advantage of UK scientific excellence in delivering its objectives.
The new group, which will be chaired by the Minister for Science, Lord Sainsbury, will have the following membership:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Minister
Lord Sainsbury DTI (Chairman)
Jeff Rooker MP Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
Peter Kilfoyle MP Cabinet Office
Alan Howarth MP Department for Culture, Media and Sport
George Mudie MP Department for Education and Employment
Alan Meale MP Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions
Derek Fatchett MP Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Lady Hayman Department of Health
Paul Boateng MP Home Office
George Foulkes MP Department for International Development
Adam Ingram MP Northern Ireland
John Denham MP Department of Social Security
John Battle MP DTI
Geoffrey Robinson MP HM Treasury
Helen Liddell MP The Scottish Office
Peter Hain MP Welsh Office
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Lord Gilbert, Minister of State in the Ministry of Defence, will receive the papers and attend for relevant items and other
Ministers will be invited where issues cover their areas of responsibility.
Subjects
Committees; Membership; Ministers; Technology; Science; Departmental coordination; Foresight
Date
14 December 1998
Reference
64081; 322 c367-8W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, What steps he is taking to ensure that British scientific research contributes to economic prosperity. (Failed OPQ). - Inc figures.
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, What steps he is taking to ensure that British scientific research contributes to economic prosperity. (Failed OPQ). - Inc figures.
Asked by
Hugh Bayley
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
25 November 1998
For answer on
3 December 1998
Answered on
3 December 1998
Mr. Bayley: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what steps he is taking to ensure that British scientific research
contributes to economic prosperity. [61312]
Mr. Mandelson: The development and commercial exploitation of scientific research is fundamental to a prosperous knowledge-driven
economy.
Important steps have already been taken such as: £1.4 billion additional funding for science; the launch earlier this year of
University challenge to help universities turn good research into good business; measures to promote collaborative partnerships such
as LINK; the creation, of a £25 million Science Enterprise Challenge announced in my right hon. Friend's the Chancellors Pre-Budget
Statement.
My forthcoming Competitiveness White Paper will address this important issue and build on these measures.
Subjects
Economic growth; Technology; Research; Science
Date
3 December 1998
Reference
61312; 321 c283W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, What steps he is taking to promote the use of science, engineering and technology across government. (Failed OPQ). - Inc figs.
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, What steps he is taking to promote the use of science, engineering and technology across government. (Failed OPQ). - Inc figs.
Asked by
Jim Dobbin
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
30 July 1998
For answer on
29 October 1998
Answered on
29 October 1998
Mr. Dobbin: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what steps he is taking to promote the use of science, engineering
and technology across Government. [55080]
Mr. Mandelson: The effective use of science, engineering and technology is one of my key priorities. The Government have already
allocated an additional £1.4 billion over the next three years, including £0.4 billion from the Wellcome Trust, to restore the
excellence of the Science and Engineering Base. And the forthcoming Competitiveness White Paper will demonstrate that science is
fundamental to helping UK companies address the challenges of the knowledge-driven economy.
Within Government we will seek to ensure that policy and regulation are always based on the best available scientific evidence. Lord
Sainsbury and I will be working with Ministers in other Government Departments both to make sure the Chief Scientific Advisor's
Guidelines on the use of scientific advice in policy making are fully and rigorously implemented and to improve public confidence in
the Government's use of scientific advice.
Subjects
Government; Engineering; Technology; Science; Scientific advisers
Date
29 October 1998
Reference
55080; 318 c285-6W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Small businesses; Technology; Work permits
Date
29 October 1998
Reference
318 c450
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Competition; Finance; Innovation; Small businesses; Technology
Date
29 October 1998
Reference
318 c449-50
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Conditions of employment; Companies; Small businesses; Trade unions; Technology
Date
29 October 1998
Reference
318 c450-1
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Asked by
Brian White
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Oral answers to questions
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, If he will comment on his Department's work in supporting high-technology SMEs.
Subjects
Competition; Finance; Innovation; Small businesses; Technology
Date
29 October 1998
Reference
318 c449-50
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, If he will comment on his Department's work in supporting high-technology SMEs.
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, If he will comment on his Department's work in supporting high-technology SMEs.
Asked by
Brian White
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Tabled on
30 July 1998
For answer on
29 October 1998
Answered on
29 October 1998
Subjects
Competition; Finance; Innovation; Small businesses; Technology
Date
29 October 1998
Reference
318 c449-50; 55055
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Statement on the allocation of the Science Budget. - Includes figures and table (Dep 98/1099).
Statement on the allocation of the Science Budget. - Includes figures and table (Dep 98/1099).
Asked by
Kerry Pollard
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
23 October 1998
For answer on
27 October 1998
Answered on
27 October 1998
Mr. Pollard: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will announce the allocation of the Science Budget; and if
he will make a statement. [56842]
Mr. Mandelson: As a result of the Comprehensive Spending Review, the Science Budget was increased by £700 million over the next
three years. This is solid evidence that science is a major priority for the Government. Of these additional funds, £300 million is
the Science Budget contribution to a ground breaking £600 million partnership with the Wellcome Trust to upgrade university research
laboratories and equipment. I am most grateful to the Trustees of the Trust for their contribution, and also their further
contribution of £110 million towards the cost of a new high intensity X-ray source. Over the period of these allocations, £35
million of the Science Budget has been reserved for this DIAMOND project. A further £20 million of the additional money for the
Science Budget is earmarked for the Science Budget's contribution to "University Challenge", a joint project to provide seed corn
funding to enable universities to exploit ideas emerging from their research.
After receiving advice from action from the Director General of Research Councils, I have decided that the Science Budget should be
allocated as follows:
£ million
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02
BBSRC 185.739 198.299 202.994 208.189
ESRC 65.990 69.754 71.174 72.901
EPSRC 382.982 397.584 410.850 427.179
MRC 290.208 304.538 319.173 334.068
NERC{1} 168.819 178.530 181.757 187.457
PPARC{1} 194.220 196.306 200.687 204.228
International/Contingency 3.028 (9.185) 15.000 15.000
CCLRC 1.462 2.000 2.000 2.000
Royal Society 22.621 23.850 24.622 25.745
Royal Academy of Engineering 3.436 3.706 4.025 4.270
OST Initiatives 2.376 2.750 2.800 2.850
Superannuation Supplement 12.298 11.991 14.368 14.750
Foresight LINK Awards 1.000 1.000 3.000 4.000
University Challenge -- 10.000 10.000 --
DIAMOND -- -- 15.000 20.000
Joint Research Equipment 4.147 7.000 10.000 10.000
Initiative
Joint Infrastructure Fund -- 75.000 100.000 125.000
Total 1,338.326 1,473.123 1,587.450 1,657.637
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
{1} NERC and PPARC figures for 1998-99 have been adjusted for cash flow changes to show the underlying baseline Further details are
available in a booklet on the allocations, which I have placed in the library of both Houses
Subjects
Finance; Technology; Research; Science
Date
27 October 1998
Reference
318 c136-8W; 56842
House
House of Commons
Statement on the outcome of the EU Research Council on 13th October.
Statement on the outcome of the EU Research Council on 13th October.
Asked by
James Plaskitt
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
19 October 1998
For answer on
20 October 1998
Answered on
20 October 1998
Mr. Plaskitt: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement on the outcome of the EU Research
Council on 13 October. [55993]
Mr. Mandelson: Lord Sainsbury, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State and Minister for Science, represented the UK at the meeting of
the EU Research Council on 13 October. The Council made further useful progress in the legislative process for the Fifth Framework
Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP5), maintaining momentum in the tight timetable for introducing FP5 at the
beginning of 1999. Though formal agreement was not possible at this stage, informal agreement was reached on the scientific and
technological content of three of the specific programmes which set out FP5's research priorities in detail. The Council also agreed
Decisions on the mandate for negotiating terms of association with FP5 with the countries seeking accession to the EU, on the
conclusion of an agreement for scientific and technological co-operation between the European Community and the United States, and
on amendments to the statutes of the Joint European Torus Joint Undertaking (JET), through which the EU pursues nuclear fusion
research.
Subjects
International cooperation; EU action; Technology; Research; Science; USA; Joint European torus; Nuclear fusion; EC Research Council
Date
20 October 1998
Reference
317 c1081W; 55993
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, if he will comment on the implementation of the Office of Science and Technology's guidelines on the use of Scientific Advice in Policy Making by Government Departments. - Includes ref to report in Library (Dep 98/909).
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, if he will comment on the implementation of the Office of Science and Technology's guidelines on the use of Scientific Advice in Policy Making by Government Departments. - Includes ref to report in Library (Dep 98/909).
Asked by
Brian Iddon
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
30 July 1998
For answer on
31 July 1998
Answered on
31 July 1998
Dr. Iddon: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement on the implementation of the Office of
Science and Technology's guidelines on the use of Scientific Advice in Policy Making by Government Departments. [55236]
Mr. Mandelson: The Government place great importance on the implementation of the guidelines as a way of ensuring the highest
standards of integrity and openness in their use of scientific advice. The Government's Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir Robert May,
has recently compiled a report in conjunction with departmental Chief Scientists on how the guidelines are being implemented by
Departments. The main conclusions from this work are set out in a report, a copy of which has been today placed in the Library of
the House.
The guidelines were prepared only a year ago but it is encouraging to see that there is already a high level of compliance across
Departments. The report contains a number of examples of good practice, but it is also clear that there is a good deal of scope for
further action. There is a considerable amount which Departments can learn from each other and we look forward to further progress
in the next twelve months.
Subjects
Technology; Research; Science; Scientific advisers
Date
31 July 1998
Reference
317 c768W; 55236
House
House of Commons
To ask the Minister without Portfolio, in what ways the Millennium Dome will demonstrate environmentally-friendly British technology.
To ask the Minister without Portfolio, in what ways the Millennium Dome will demonstrate environmentally-friendly British technology.
Asked by
Helen Clark
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Minister without Portfolio
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
11 May 1998
For answer on
21 May 1998
Answered on
21 May 1998
Mrs. Brinton: To ask the Minister without Portfolio in what ways the Millennium Dome will demonstrate environmentally friendly
British technology. [41930]
Mr. Mandelson: The exhibit in the Dome currently entitled "Living Island" will explore ways in which individuals can protect and
enhance their environment. The New Millennium Experience Company (NMEC) is in regular touch with DTI and DETR on science and
technology and environmental matters, and is consulting and seeking advice from a number of environmental groups about the content
and nature of this zone. The NMEC aims to include a range of features on the Dome site which demonstrate applications of
environmental technology. The Millennium Experience will also feature a number of environmental state of the art products and
services from the Millennium products award scheme.
Subjects
Department of Trade and Industry; Environment protection; Technology; Science; Millennium exhibition; Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions; New Millennium Experience
Date
21 May 1998
Reference
312 c490W; 41930
House
House of Commons