1-11 of 11 results for subject:Vetting
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.32 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Vetting
- We searched for
- subject_t:Vetting OR subject_t:Blacklisting OR subject_t:"Positive vetting" OR subject_ses:93418
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what the difference is between standard security checks and developed vetting carried out in respect of officials employed in the civil service; how many officials in No. 10 Downing street have been subject to (a) standard security clearance and (b) developed vetting;...
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what the difference is between standard security checks and developed vetting carried out in respect of officials employed in the civil service; how many officials in No. 10 Downing street have been subject to (a) standard security clearance and (b) developed vetting;...
Details of the national security vetting policy and process are set out in the document HMG Personnel Security Controls, available from the House of Commons Library or online at:
www.gov.uk/government/publications/hmg-personnel-security-controls
It has been the policy of successive governments not to comment on staff subject to national security vetting.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office (1) how many staff working (a) at No. 10 Downing Street and (b) for the Prime Minister (i) have been allowed to attend National Security Council meetings and (ii) had access to Top Secret meetings or documents without being required to have...
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office (1) how many staff working (a) at No. 10 Downing Street and (b) for the Prime Minister (i) have been allowed to attend National Security Council meetings and (ii) had access to Top Secret meetings or documents without being required to have...
Attendance at internal meetings is not normally disclosed.
It has been the policy of successive Governments not to comment about staff subject to national security vetting.
(2) how many people working (a) at No. 10 Downing Street and (b) on the Prime Minister's staff since May 2010 have not been required to undergo security vetting; how many such staff have undergone security vetting; and what the job titles and responsibilities are of all such staff.
Steve McCabe:
(2) how many people working (a) at No. 10 Downing Street and (b) on the Prime Minister's staff since May 2010 have not been required to undergo security vetting; how many such staff have undergone security vetting; and what the job titles and responsibilities are of all such staff.
Steve McCabe:
Attendance at internal meetings is not normally disclosed.
It has been the policy of successive Governments not to comment about staff subject to national security vetting.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what background checks are regularly made on appointees to quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisations.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what background checks are regularly made on appointees to quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisations.
As was the case under the previous Administration, the Government expects all holders of public office to work to the highest personal and professional standards. As set out in the Code of Conduct for Board Members of Public Bodies, public appointees are expected to uphold the standards of conduct set out in the Committee on Standards in Public Life’s Seven Principles of Public Life.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how many candidates for special adviser posts have not been appointed because they have not received security clearance since May 2010; how many special advisers have had their security clearance (a) withdrawn or (b) suspended since May 2010; and if he will...
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how many candidates for special adviser posts have not been appointed because they have not received security clearance since May 2010; how many special advisers have had their security clearance (a) withdrawn or (b) suspended since May 2010; and if he will...
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 14 May 2013, Official Report, column 138W.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office (1) how many current Government special advisers have been subject to (a) all forms of personnel security control, (b) a counter terrorism check, (c) a security check and (d) developed vetting;
[155094]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office (1) how many current Government special advisers have been subject to (a) all forms of personnel security control, (b) a counter terrorism check, (c) a security check and (d) developed vetting;
[155094]
As was the practice under the previous Administration, each Government Department is responsible for determining its personnel security controls and any related vetting requirements, in line with the HMG Security Policy Framework. Information on the framework is available via:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hmg-personnel-security-controls
Information relating to internal discussion and advice is not normally disclosed. Information about individual security clearances is not held centrally.
(3) how many special advisers have used the appeals process to challenge an adverse vetting decision since May 2010.
[155182]
Mr Watson:
(3) how many special advisers have used the appeals process to challenge an adverse vetting decision since May 2010.
[155182]
Mr Watson:
As was the practice under the previous Administration, each Government Department is responsible for determining its personnel security controls and any related vetting requirements, in line with the HMG Security Policy Framework. Information on the framework is available via:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hmg-personnel-security-controls
Information relating to internal discussion and advice is not normally disclosed. Information about individual security clearances is not held centrally.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills if he will estimate the number of publicly-funded projects undertaken by firms that engage in blacklisting against trade union members.
[119625]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills if he will estimate the number of publicly-funded projects undertaken by firms that engage in blacklisting against trade union members.
[119625]
I have been asked to reply on behalf of the Cabinet Office.
My Department does not hold this information centrally.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office (1) whether Abid Hussain was subject to any form of security vetting before accompanying the Minister without Portfolio on official overseas visits;
[112977]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office (1) whether Abid Hussain was subject to any form of security vetting before accompanying the Minister without Portfolio on official overseas visits;
[112977]
Mr Abid Hussain has not been part of any official delegation for any of the Minister without Portfolio’s overseas visits.
How many posts in the Inland Revenue in Northern Ireland are subject to counter-terrorist checks under the new procedures for security vetting announced by the Prime Minister on 24th July 1990. - Inc figures.
How many posts in the Inland Revenue in Northern Ireland are subject to counter-terrorist checks under the new procedures for security vetting announced by the Prime Minister on 24th July 1990. - Inc figures.
How many posts in the Inland Revenue in Northern Ireland are subject to reliability checks under the new procedures for security vetting announced by the Prime Minister on 24th July 1990.
How many posts in the Inland Revenue in Northern Ireland are subject to reliability checks under the new procedures for security vetting announced by the Prime Minister on 24th July 1990.