1-14 of 14 results for subject:Dogs
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.177 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Dogs
- We searched for
- subject_t:Dogs OR subject_ses:9688
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many (a) horses and (b) dogs were euthanised by his Department in each month in 2013 and 2014; and what the reasons were in each such case.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many (a) horses and (b) dogs were euthanised by his Department in each month in 2013 and 2014; and what the reasons were in each such case.
Decisions to euthanise any animal in military service are only taken by a veterinarian officer after all possible treatment avenues have been exhausted and where it is considered to be the most humane option for the animal. The only other scenario where an animal would be euthanised is where it is considered to pose a risk to public safety.
The numbers of horses and dogs euthanised by the Department in each month during 2013 and until 31 October 2014 with reasons are provided in the attached tables.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many dogs owned by his Department were subject to euthanasia in (a) 2012-13 and (b) 2013-14; and what the reason was for euthanasia in each case.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many dogs owned by his Department were subject to euthanasia in (a) 2012-13 and (b) 2013-14; and what the reason was for euthanasia in each case.
Decisions to euthanise any animal in military service are only taken by a veterinarian officer after all possible treatment avenues have been exhausted and where it is considered to be the most humane option for the animal. The only other scenario where an animal would be euthanised is where it is considered to pose a risk to public safety.
The tables show the number of military working dogs that have been euthanised during 2012-13 and 2013-14, and the reasons for doing so:
| 2012-13 | |
| Reason | Number |
| Abdominal
Catastrophe | 4 |
| Aged
-
Welfare | 11 |
| Cardiac
Disease | 1 |
| Dangerous
Temperament | 2 |
| Failing
to maintain standards (Welfare)-the animal is not suitable for
re-homing based on behaviour and temperament, with potential
consequences for an individual’s
welfare | 4 |
| Hip
Dysplasia | 1 |
| Malignant
Neoplasia | 7 |
| Multiple
Chronic Disease
Processes | 6 |
| Neurological
Disease | 5 |
| Osteoarthritis | 20 |
| Total | 61 |
| 2013-14 | |
| Reason | Number |
| Abdominal
Catastrophe | 5 |
| Aged
-
Welfare | 7 |
| Cardiac
Disease | 2 |
| Chronic
Gastro Intestinal
Disease | 2 |
| Dangerous
Temperament | 13 |
| Malignant
Neoplasia | 4 |
| Multiple
Chronic Disease
Processes | 2 |
| Neurological
Disease | 8 |
| Osteoarthritis | 16 |
| Total | 59 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence for what reason his Department has recently issued a recall for improvised explosive device detection dogs to be returned to the Defence Animal Centre for rehoming; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence for what reason his Department has recently issued a recall for improvised explosive device detection dogs to be returned to the Defence Animal Centre for rehoming; and if he will make a statement.
It is Directorate of Army Veterinary Remount Services policy that all classifications of military working dogs, including counter-improvised explosive device (C-IED) dogs, that fall below the minimum operational standards, are returned to the Canine Training Squadron at the Defence Animal Centre where they are given a detailed health and employment evaluation by qualified and experienced dog trainers and veterinary officers.
For the majority, the evaluation is followed by a period of focused restorative training prior to being issued back to the Front Line Command or a new Defence user. For a small number this will not be an option and, in the case of dogs purchased to meet the C-IED Urgent Operational Requirement, an independent evaluation team will confirm that they are no longer able to remain within the service and re-homing is to be explored.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much money has been raised in each of the last five years from the sale of military working dogs which have been withdrawn from service.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much money has been raised in each of the last five years from the sale of military working dogs which have been withdrawn from service.
The amount of money raised from the sale of military working dogs that are no longer in service or have failed training over the last five years is shown in the following table:
| £ | |
| 2008 | 4,890.00 |
| 2009 | 8,707.00 |
| 2010 | 8,200.00 |
| 2011 | 15,490.40 |
| 2012 | 5,596.80 |
| 2013
(To
date) | 12,095.19 |
Money from the sale of military working dogs is re-invested back into the Defence Animal Centre's animal procurement budget to contribute towards purchase costs of the next generation of military working animals.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make it his policy that military dog handlers be given first refusal of taking ownership of a dog when the decision is taken to withdraw it from service.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make it his policy that military dog handlers be given first refusal of taking ownership of a dog when the decision is taken to withdraw it from service.
Any requests to re-home a specific military working animal when they retire from service are appended to the animal's service record.
A dog may have many handlers during their service career, and more than one may request to re-home it on retirement. The dog is normally offered to the individual who made the first request, dependent upon the individual and the dog's circumstances, but the welfare of the animal is always our over-riding concern.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what requirement is placed on those bidding for military working dogs withdrawn from service as to their competence with animal welfare; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what requirement is placed on those bidding for military working dogs withdrawn from service as to their competence with animal welfare; and if he will make a statement.
Applicants wishing to re-home military working dogs are vetted by interview to determine suitability and a judgment is made by the Ministry of Defence's Procurement and Re-homing Section as to the appropriateness of the individual.
When a suitable dog is identified, all interested parties are invited to come and meet the dog with family and other pets, if applicable.
Each new owner is required to complete a ‘contract sale of dog’ which states that they must abide by the Animal Welfare Act 2006 and are not to compromise the Five Freedoms which are fully stated in the contract.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many military working dogs have been sold following the decision to withdraw them from service (a) in 2012 and (b) so far in the current calendar year; and how many such dogs were purchased by their handler.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many military working dogs have been sold following the decision to withdraw them from service (a) in 2012 and (b) so far in the current calendar year; and how many such dogs were purchased by their handler.
Information on the number of military working dogs that have been sold in 2012 and in 2013 to date, and how many have been sold to their handlers, is shown in the following table:
| Number
of dogs
sold | Number
sold to
handlers | |
| 2012 | 142 | 87 |
| 2013
(to
date) | 84 | 59 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how many and what proportion of military working dogs were (a) put down and (b) re-homed at the end of their service in the last twelve months;
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how many and what proportion of military working dogs were (a) put down and (b) re-homed at the end of their service in the last twelve months;
Military working dogs and their handlers provide a valuable range of specialist roles world wide. When they reach the end of their military service life, it is the Department's policy to re-home all suitable military working dogs, often with someone closely associated with the dog while it was serving. Members of the public can also apply to re-home retired military working dogs and there are currently around 150 people waiting for a suitable dog to become available.
There are currently 1,110 military working dogs in service within the Ministry of Defence. The number of dogs re-homed between January 2010 and 7 October 2013 is as follows:
| Number
of military working dogs
re-homed | |
| 2010 | 92 |
| 2011 | 80 |
| 2012 | 104 |
| 2013
(7 October
2013) | 83 |
It is deeply distressing for all concerned if a dog has to be put down, however this decision is only taken by a veterinarian officer after all other possible avenues have been exhausted and only ever when it is the most humane option for the dog or where there is a considered risk to public safety.
There is no legislative requirement for a legal framework to control the number of military working dogs that are put down, and there are no plans to implement one.
Information on the number of military working dogs that have been put down since 2010, and the reasons for doing so is provided in the following tables:
| 2010 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 48 |
| Chronic
skin
disease | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 17 |
| Heart
failure | 3 |
| Injuries
sustained in a
RTA | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multi
organ
failure | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 11 |
| Osteoarthritis | 18 |
| Severe
chest
wound | 1 |
| Severe
injury | 1 |
| Severe
ophthalmological
disease | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 2 |
| Severe
soft tissue
disease | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 1 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| 2010
total | 117 |
| 2011 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 3 |
| Aged—welfare | 20 |
| Catastrophic
bone
fracture | 1 |
| Complications
following
trauma | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 11 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 11 |
| Neurological | 10 |
| Osteoarthritis | 17 |
| Peritonitis | 1 |
| Severe
ligament
damage | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 2 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| Unknown—suspected
coagulopathy | 1 |
| 2011
total | 84 |
| 2012 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 16 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological
disease | 1 |
| Complications
following fracture
repair | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 2 |
| Heart
disease | 2 |
| Internal
injuries following
trauma | 1 |
| Malignancy | 6 |
| Metabolic
disease | 1 |
| Multiple
extensive
injuries | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 9 |
| Osteoarthritis | 22 |
| Ruptured
spleen | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 3 |
| Suspected
neurological
disease | 1 |
| 2012
total | 71 |
| 20131 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 1 |
| Aged—welfare | 4 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 5 |
| Died—Oral
Pyriprole
toxicity | 3 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multiple
chronic disease
processes | 1 |
| Osteoarthritis | 10 |
| 2013
total | 30 |
| 1
January to June |
(2) for what reasons military dogs were put down at the end of their service in each year since 2010; and if he will make a statement;
Mr Amess:
(2) for what reasons military dogs were put down at the end of their service in each year since 2010; and if he will make a statement;
Mr Amess:
Military working dogs and their handlers provide a valuable range of specialist roles world wide. When they reach the end of their military service life, it is the Department's policy to re-home all suitable military working dogs, often with someone closely associated with the dog while it was serving. Members of the public can also apply to re-home retired military working dogs and there are currently around 150 people waiting for a suitable dog to become available.
There are currently 1,110 military working dogs in service within the Ministry of Defence. The number of dogs re-homed between January 2010 and 7 October 2013 is as follows:
| Number
of military working dogs
re-homed | |
| 2010 | 92 |
| 2011 | 80 |
| 2012 | 104 |
| 2013
(7 October
2013) | 83 |
It is deeply distressing for all concerned if a dog has to be put down, however this decision is only taken by a veterinarian officer after all other possible avenues have been exhausted and only ever when it is the most humane option for the dog or where there is a considered risk to public safety.
There is no legislative requirement for a legal framework to control the number of military working dogs that are put down, and there are no plans to implement one.
Information on the number of military working dogs that have been put down since 2010, and the reasons for doing so is provided in the following tables:
| 2010 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 48 |
| Chronic
skin
disease | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 17 |
| Heart
failure | 3 |
| Injuries
sustained in a
RTA | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multi
organ
failure | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 11 |
| Osteoarthritis | 18 |
| Severe
chest
wound | 1 |
| Severe
injury | 1 |
| Severe
ophthalmological
disease | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 2 |
| Severe
soft tissue
disease | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 1 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| 2010
total | 117 |
| 2011 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 3 |
| Aged—welfare | 20 |
| Catastrophic
bone
fracture | 1 |
| Complications
following
trauma | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 11 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 11 |
| Neurological | 10 |
| Osteoarthritis | 17 |
| Peritonitis | 1 |
| Severe
ligament
damage | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 2 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| Unknown—suspected
coagulopathy | 1 |
| 2011
total | 84 |
| 2012 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 16 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological
disease | 1 |
| Complications
following fracture
repair | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 2 |
| Heart
disease | 2 |
| Internal
injuries following
trauma | 1 |
| Malignancy | 6 |
| Metabolic
disease | 1 |
| Multiple
extensive
injuries | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 9 |
| Osteoarthritis | 22 |
| Ruptured
spleen | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 3 |
| Suspected
neurological
disease | 1 |
| 2012
total | 71 |
| 20131 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 1 |
| Aged—welfare | 4 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 5 |
| Died—Oral
Pyriprole
toxicity | 3 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multiple
chronic disease
processes | 1 |
| Osteoarthritis | 10 |
| 2013
total | 30 |
| 1
January to June |
(3) what provisions are made for military working dogs that are (a) healthy, (b) have an illness and (c) injured at the end of their service;
Mr Amess:
(3) what provisions are made for military working dogs that are (a) healthy, (b) have an illness and (c) injured at the end of their service;
Mr Amess:
Military working dogs and their handlers provide a valuable range of specialist roles world wide. When they reach the end of their military service life, it is the Department's policy to re-home all suitable military working dogs, often with someone closely associated with the dog while it was serving. Members of the public can also apply to re-home retired military working dogs and there are currently around 150 people waiting for a suitable dog to become available.
There are currently 1,110 military working dogs in service within the Ministry of Defence. The number of dogs re-homed between January 2010 and 7 October 2013 is as follows:
| Number
of military working dogs
re-homed | |
| 2010 | 92 |
| 2011 | 80 |
| 2012 | 104 |
| 2013
(7 October
2013) | 83 |
It is deeply distressing for all concerned if a dog has to be put down, however this decision is only taken by a veterinarian officer after all other possible avenues have been exhausted and only ever when it is the most humane option for the dog or where there is a considered risk to public safety.
There is no legislative requirement for a legal framework to control the number of military working dogs that are put down, and there are no plans to implement one.
Information on the number of military working dogs that have been put down since 2010, and the reasons for doing so is provided in the following tables:
| 2010 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 48 |
| Chronic
skin
disease | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 17 |
| Heart
failure | 3 |
| Injuries
sustained in a
RTA | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multi
organ
failure | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 11 |
| Osteoarthritis | 18 |
| Severe
chest
wound | 1 |
| Severe
injury | 1 |
| Severe
ophthalmological
disease | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 2 |
| Severe
soft tissue
disease | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 1 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| 2010
total | 117 |
| 2011 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 3 |
| Aged—welfare | 20 |
| Catastrophic
bone
fracture | 1 |
| Complications
following
trauma | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 11 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 11 |
| Neurological | 10 |
| Osteoarthritis | 17 |
| Peritonitis | 1 |
| Severe
ligament
damage | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 2 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| Unknown—suspected
coagulopathy | 1 |
| 2011
total | 84 |
| 2012 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 16 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological
disease | 1 |
| Complications
following fracture
repair | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 2 |
| Heart
disease | 2 |
| Internal
injuries following
trauma | 1 |
| Malignancy | 6 |
| Metabolic
disease | 1 |
| Multiple
extensive
injuries | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 9 |
| Osteoarthritis | 22 |
| Ruptured
spleen | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 3 |
| Suspected
neurological
disease | 1 |
| 2012
total | 71 |
| 20131 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 1 |
| Aged—welfare | 4 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 5 |
| Died—Oral
Pyriprole
toxicity | 3 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multiple
chronic disease
processes | 1 |
| Osteoarthritis | 10 |
| 2013
total | 30 |
| 1
January to June |
(4) what options are considered before deciding to put down military working dogs at the end of their service and if he will make a statement;
Mr Amess:
(4) what options are considered before deciding to put down military working dogs at the end of their service and if he will make a statement;
Mr Amess:
Military working dogs and their handlers provide a valuable range of specialist roles world wide. When they reach the end of their military service life, it is the Department's policy to re-home all suitable military working dogs, often with someone closely associated with the dog while it was serving. Members of the public can also apply to re-home retired military working dogs and there are currently around 150 people waiting for a suitable dog to become available.
There are currently 1,110 military working dogs in service within the Ministry of Defence. The number of dogs re-homed between January 2010 and 7 October 2013 is as follows:
| Number
of military working dogs
re-homed | |
| 2010 | 92 |
| 2011 | 80 |
| 2012 | 104 |
| 2013
(7 October
2013) | 83 |
It is deeply distressing for all concerned if a dog has to be put down, however this decision is only taken by a veterinarian officer after all other possible avenues have been exhausted and only ever when it is the most humane option for the dog or where there is a considered risk to public safety.
There is no legislative requirement for a legal framework to control the number of military working dogs that are put down, and there are no plans to implement one.
Information on the number of military working dogs that have been put down since 2010, and the reasons for doing so is provided in the following tables:
| 2010 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 48 |
| Chronic
skin
disease | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 17 |
| Heart
failure | 3 |
| Injuries
sustained in a
RTA | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multi
organ
failure | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 11 |
| Osteoarthritis | 18 |
| Severe
chest
wound | 1 |
| Severe
injury | 1 |
| Severe
ophthalmological
disease | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 2 |
| Severe
soft tissue
disease | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 1 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| 2010
total | 117 |
| 2011 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 3 |
| Aged—welfare | 20 |
| Catastrophic
bone
fracture | 1 |
| Complications
following
trauma | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 11 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 11 |
| Neurological | 10 |
| Osteoarthritis | 17 |
| Peritonitis | 1 |
| Severe
ligament
damage | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 2 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| Unknown—suspected
coagulopathy | 1 |
| 2011
total | 84 |
| 2012 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 16 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological
disease | 1 |
| Complications
following fracture
repair | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 2 |
| Heart
disease | 2 |
| Internal
injuries following
trauma | 1 |
| Malignancy | 6 |
| Metabolic
disease | 1 |
| Multiple
extensive
injuries | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 9 |
| Osteoarthritis | 22 |
| Ruptured
spleen | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 3 |
| Suspected
neurological
disease | 1 |
| 2012
total | 71 |
| 20131 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 1 |
| Aged—welfare | 4 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 5 |
| Died—Oral
Pyriprole
toxicity | 3 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multiple
chronic disease
processes | 1 |
| Osteoarthritis | 10 |
| 2013
total | 30 |
| 1
January to June |
(5) who within his Department takes the final decision to put down military working dogs at the end of their service and if he will make a statement;
Mr Amess:
(5) who within his Department takes the final decision to put down military working dogs at the end of their service and if he will make a statement;
Mr Amess:
Military working dogs and their handlers provide a valuable range of specialist roles world wide. When they reach the end of their military service life, it is the Department's policy to re-home all suitable military working dogs, often with someone closely associated with the dog while it was serving. Members of the public can also apply to re-home retired military working dogs and there are currently around 150 people waiting for a suitable dog to become available.
There are currently 1,110 military working dogs in service within the Ministry of Defence. The number of dogs re-homed between January 2010 and 7 October 2013 is as follows:
| Number
of military working dogs
re-homed | |
| 2010 | 92 |
| 2011 | 80 |
| 2012 | 104 |
| 2013
(7 October
2013) | 83 |
It is deeply distressing for all concerned if a dog has to be put down, however this decision is only taken by a veterinarian officer after all other possible avenues have been exhausted and only ever when it is the most humane option for the dog or where there is a considered risk to public safety.
There is no legislative requirement for a legal framework to control the number of military working dogs that are put down, and there are no plans to implement one.
Information on the number of military working dogs that have been put down since 2010, and the reasons for doing so is provided in the following tables:
| 2010 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 48 |
| Chronic
skin
disease | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 17 |
| Heart
failure | 3 |
| Injuries
sustained in a
RTA | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multi
organ
failure | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 11 |
| Osteoarthritis | 18 |
| Severe
chest
wound | 1 |
| Severe
injury | 1 |
| Severe
ophthalmological
disease | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 2 |
| Severe
soft tissue
disease | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 1 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| 2010
total | 117 |
| 2011 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 3 |
| Aged—welfare | 20 |
| Catastrophic
bone
fracture | 1 |
| Complications
following
trauma | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 11 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 11 |
| Neurological | 10 |
| Osteoarthritis | 17 |
| Peritonitis | 1 |
| Severe
ligament
damage | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 2 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| Unknown—suspected
coagulopathy | 1 |
| 2011
total | 84 |
| 2012 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 16 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological
disease | 1 |
| Complications
following fracture
repair | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 2 |
| Heart
disease | 2 |
| Internal
injuries following
trauma | 1 |
| Malignancy | 6 |
| Metabolic
disease | 1 |
| Multiple
extensive
injuries | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 9 |
| Osteoarthritis | 22 |
| Ruptured
spleen | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 3 |
| Suspected
neurological
disease | 1 |
| 2012
total | 71 |
| 20131 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 1 |
| Aged—welfare | 4 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 5 |
| Died—Oral
Pyriprole
toxicity | 3 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multiple
chronic disease
processes | 1 |
| Osteoarthritis | 10 |
| 2013
total | 30 |
| 1
January to June |
(6) if he will investigate the number of military working dogs put down at the end of their service; and if he will make a statement;
Mr Amess:
(6) if he will investigate the number of military working dogs put down at the end of their service; and if he will make a statement;
Mr Amess:
Military working dogs and their handlers provide a valuable range of specialist roles world wide. When they reach the end of their military service life, it is the Department's policy to re-home all suitable military working dogs, often with someone closely associated with the dog while it was serving. Members of the public can also apply to re-home retired military working dogs and there are currently around 150 people waiting for a suitable dog to become available.
There are currently 1,110 military working dogs in service within the Ministry of Defence. The number of dogs re-homed between January 2010 and 7 October 2013 is as follows:
| Number
of military working dogs
re-homed | |
| 2010 | 92 |
| 2011 | 80 |
| 2012 | 104 |
| 2013
(7 October
2013) | 83 |
It is deeply distressing for all concerned if a dog has to be put down, however this decision is only taken by a veterinarian officer after all other possible avenues have been exhausted and only ever when it is the most humane option for the dog or where there is a considered risk to public safety.
There is no legislative requirement for a legal framework to control the number of military working dogs that are put down, and there are no plans to implement one.
Information on the number of military working dogs that have been put down since 2010, and the reasons for doing so is provided in the following tables:
| 2010 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 48 |
| Chronic
skin
disease | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 17 |
| Heart
failure | 3 |
| Injuries
sustained in a
RTA | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multi
organ
failure | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 11 |
| Osteoarthritis | 18 |
| Severe
chest
wound | 1 |
| Severe
injury | 1 |
| Severe
ophthalmological
disease | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 2 |
| Severe
soft tissue
disease | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 1 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| 2010
total | 117 |
| 2011 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 3 |
| Aged—welfare | 20 |
| Catastrophic
bone
fracture | 1 |
| Complications
following
trauma | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 11 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 11 |
| Neurological | 10 |
| Osteoarthritis | 17 |
| Peritonitis | 1 |
| Severe
ligament
damage | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 2 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| Unknown—suspected
coagulopathy | 1 |
| 2011
total | 84 |
| 2012 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 16 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological
disease | 1 |
| Complications
following fracture
repair | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 2 |
| Heart
disease | 2 |
| Internal
injuries following
trauma | 1 |
| Malignancy | 6 |
| Metabolic
disease | 1 |
| Multiple
extensive
injuries | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 9 |
| Osteoarthritis | 22 |
| Ruptured
spleen | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 3 |
| Suspected
neurological
disease | 1 |
| 2012
total | 71 |
| 20131 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 1 |
| Aged—welfare | 4 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 5 |
| Died—Oral
Pyriprole
toxicity | 3 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multiple
chronic disease
processes | 1 |
| Osteoarthritis | 10 |
| 2013
total | 30 |
| 1
January to June |
(7) what legal framework is currently in place to control the number of military working dogs that are put down; what plans he has to amend this framework; and if he will make a statement.
Mr Amess:
(7) what legal framework is currently in place to control the number of military working dogs that are put down; what plans he has to amend this framework; and if he will make a statement.
Mr Amess:
Military working dogs and their handlers provide a valuable range of specialist roles world wide. When they reach the end of their military service life, it is the Department's policy to re-home all suitable military working dogs, often with someone closely associated with the dog while it was serving. Members of the public can also apply to re-home retired military working dogs and there are currently around 150 people waiting for a suitable dog to become available.
There are currently 1,110 military working dogs in service within the Ministry of Defence. The number of dogs re-homed between January 2010 and 7 October 2013 is as follows:
| Number
of military working dogs
re-homed | |
| 2010 | 92 |
| 2011 | 80 |
| 2012 | 104 |
| 2013
(7 October
2013) | 83 |
It is deeply distressing for all concerned if a dog has to be put down, however this decision is only taken by a veterinarian officer after all other possible avenues have been exhausted and only ever when it is the most humane option for the dog or where there is a considered risk to public safety.
There is no legislative requirement for a legal framework to control the number of military working dogs that are put down, and there are no plans to implement one.
Information on the number of military working dogs that have been put down since 2010, and the reasons for doing so is provided in the following tables:
| 2010 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 48 |
| Chronic
skin
disease | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 17 |
| Heart
failure | 3 |
| Injuries
sustained in a
RTA | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multi
organ
failure | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 11 |
| Osteoarthritis | 18 |
| Severe
chest
wound | 1 |
| Severe
injury | 1 |
| Severe
ophthalmological
disease | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 2 |
| Severe
soft tissue
disease | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 1 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| 2010
total | 117 |
| 2011 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 3 |
| Aged—welfare | 20 |
| Catastrophic
bone
fracture | 1 |
| Complications
following
trauma | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 11 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 11 |
| Neurological | 10 |
| Osteoarthritis | 17 |
| Peritonitis | 1 |
| Severe
ligament
damage | 1 |
| Spinal
disease | 2 |
| Unknown | 4 |
| Unknown—suspected
coagulopathy | 1 |
| 2011
total | 84 |
| 2012 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 2 |
| Aged—welfare | 16 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological
disease | 1 |
| Complications
following fracture
repair | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 2 |
| Heart
disease | 2 |
| Internal
injuries following
trauma | 1 |
| Malignancy | 6 |
| Metabolic
disease | 1 |
| Multiple
extensive
injuries | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal
disease | 1 |
| Neurological | 9 |
| Osteoarthritis | 22 |
| Ruptured
spleen | 1 |
| Severe
skin
disease | 3 |
| Suspected
neurological
disease | 1 |
| 2012
total | 71 |
| 20131 | |
| Reason | Total |
| Abdominal
catastrophe | 1 |
| Aged—welfare | 4 |
| Blindness | 1 |
| Chronic
gastroenterological | 1 |
| Dangerous
temperament | 5 |
| Died—Oral
Pyriprole
toxicity | 3 |
| Heart
disease | 1 |
| Malignancy | 3 |
| Multiple
chronic disease
processes | 1 |
| Osteoarthritis | 10 |
| 2013
total | 30 |
| 1
January to June |