Skip to main content

Written question asked by David Amess (Conservative) on Monday, 7 October 2013, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 9 October 2013. It was answered by Anna Soubry (Conservative) on Thursday, 10 October 2013 on behalf of the Ministry of Defence.


Armed Forces: Dogs

Question

(4) what options are considered before deciding to put down military working dogs at the end of their service and if he will make a statement;

Mr Amess:

Answer

Military working dogs and their handlers provide a valuable range of specialist roles world wide. When they reach the end of their military service life, it is the Department's policy to re-home all suitable military working dogs, often with someone closely associated with the dog while it was serving. Members of the public can also apply to re-home retired military working dogs and there are currently around 150 people waiting for a suitable dog to become available.

There are currently 1,110 military working dogs in service within the Ministry of Defence. The number of dogs re-homed between January 2010 and 7 October 2013 is as follows:

Number of military working dogs re-homed
2010
92
2011
80
2012
104
2013 (7 October 2013)
83

It is deeply distressing for all concerned if a dog has to be put down, however this decision is only taken by a veterinarian officer after all other possible avenues have been exhausted and only ever when it is the most humane option for the dog or where there is a considered risk to public safety.

There is no legislative requirement for a legal framework to control the number of military working dogs that are put down, and there are no plans to implement one.

Information on the number of military working dogs that have been put down since 2010, and the reasons for doing so is provided in the following tables:

2010
Reason
Total
Abdominal catastrophe
2
Aged—welfare
48
Chronic skin disease
1
Dangerous temperament
17
Heart failure
3
Injuries sustained in a RTA
1
Malignancy
3
Multi organ failure
1
Musculoskeletal disease
1
Neurological
11
Osteoarthritis
18
Severe chest wound
1
Severe injury
1
Severe ophthalmological disease
1
Severe skin disease
2
Severe soft tissue disease
1
Spinal disease
1
Unknown
4
2010 total
117
2011
Reason
Total
Abdominal catastrophe
3
Aged—welfare
20
Catastrophic bone fracture
1
Complications following trauma
1
Dangerous temperament
11
Heart disease
1
Malignancy
11
Neurological
10
Osteoarthritis
17
Peritonitis
1
Severe ligament damage
1
Spinal disease
2
Unknown
4
Unknown—suspected coagulopathy
1
2011 total
84
2012
Reason
Total
Abdominal catastrophe
2
Aged—welfare
16
Blindness
1
Chronic gastroenterological disease
1
Complications following fracture repair
1
Dangerous temperament
2
Heart disease
2
Internal injuries following trauma
1
Malignancy
6
Metabolic disease
1
Multiple extensive injuries
1
Musculoskeletal disease
1
Neurological
9
Osteoarthritis
22
Ruptured spleen
1
Severe skin disease
3
Suspected neurological disease
1
2012 total
71
20131
Reason
Total
Abdominal catastrophe
1
Aged—welfare
4
Blindness
1
Chronic gastroenterological
1
Dangerous temperament
5
Died—Oral Pyriprole toxicity
3
Heart disease
1
Malignancy
3
Multiple chronic disease processes
1
Osteoarthritis
10
2013 total
30
1 January to June

Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
169817; 568 cc412-4W
Session
2013-14
Subjects
Armed forces Dogs
Contains statistics
Yes
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk