1-17 of 17 results for subject:Injunctions
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.238 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Injunctions
- We searched for
- subject_t:Injunctions OR subject_ses:91670
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice if he will direct HM Courts Service to record the number of injunctive orders granted by the courts which provide that the existence of the injunction may not be disclosed; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice if he will direct HM Courts Service to record the number of injunctive orders granted by the courts which provide that the existence of the injunction may not be disclosed; and if he will make a statement.
(2) if he will (a) collate and (b) publish statistics on the numbers of injunctions issued in the High Court in the last five years where the claimants have been granted anonymity in the listed name of the case.
(2) if he will (a) collate and (b) publish statistics on the numbers of injunctions issued in the High Court in the last five years where the claimants have been granted anonymity in the listed name of the case.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what information his Department holds on the number of non-reportable injunctive orders each judge of the High Court has issued in each of the last five years;
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what information his Department holds on the number of non-reportable injunctive orders each judge of the High Court has issued in each of the last five years;
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the Prime Minister's Answer of 14 October 2009, Official Report, column 204, what steps he plans to take to assess the implications of the injunction obtained in the High Court by Trafigura in the case listed as (1) RJW (2)...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the Prime Minister's Answer of 14 October 2009, Official Report, column 204, what steps he plans to take to assess the implications of the injunction obtained in the High Court by Trafigura in the case listed as (1) RJW (2)...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what guidance the judiciary issues on the circumstances in which injunctive orders may be granted in such a way as to conceal the identity of the claimant; and if he will make a statement;
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what guidance the judiciary issues on the circumstances in which injunctive orders may be granted in such a way as to conceal the identity of the claimant; and if he will make a statement;
(2) what (a) guidance issued to the judiciary and (b) rules of procedure in operation to the courts govern the issuance of injunctive orders; and what provision is made in each case in respect of the qualified privilege to report parliamentary proceedings.
(2) what (a) guidance issued to the judiciary and (b) rules of procedure in operation to the courts govern the issuance of injunctive orders; and what provision is made in each case in respect of the qualified privilege to report parliamentary proceedings.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of legislation to protect (a) whistleblowers and (b) press freedom following the injunctions obtained in the High Court by (i) Barclays and Freshfields solicitors on 19 March 2009 on the publication of internal...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of legislation to protect (a) whistleblowers and (b) press freedom following the injunctions obtained in the High Court by (i) Barclays and Freshfields solicitors on 19 March 2009 on the publication of internal...
(2) what assessment he has made of the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in May 2009 in the case of Michael Napier and Irwin Mitchell v. Pressdram Limited in respect of press freedom to report proceedings in court.
(2) what assessment he has made of the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in May 2009 in the case of Michael Napier and Irwin Mitchell v. Pressdram Limited in respect of press freedom to report proceedings in court.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what mechanisms HM Courts Service uses to draw up rosters of duty judges for the purpose of considering time of the essence applications for the issuing of injunctions by the High Court.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what mechanisms HM Courts Service uses to draw up rosters of duty judges for the purpose of considering time of the essence applications for the issuing of injunctions by the High Court.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, at what time on 20th February he informed the Prime Minister's Office he intended to seek an injunction against the Sunday Telegraph; and if he will make a statement. - Prime Minister's Office was informed around 7pm on Saturday 20...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, at what time on 20th February he informed the Prime Minister's Office he intended to seek an injunction against the Sunday Telegraph; and if he will make a statement. - Prime Minister's Office was informed around 7pm on Saturday 20...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, at what time on 20th February he informed the honourable Member for Brent South that he intended to seek an injunction against the Sunday Telegraph; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, at what time on 20th February he informed the honourable Member for Brent South that he intended to seek an injunction against the Sunday Telegraph; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if (a) he and (b) his officials had seen a copy of the edition of the Sunday Telegraph of 21st February containing a number of paragraphs from the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry report before he sought an injunction against that paper;...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if (a) he and (b) his officials had seen a copy of the edition of the Sunday Telegraph of 21st February containing a number of paragraphs from the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry report before he sought an injunction against that paper;...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, at what time on 20th February he applied for an injunction against the Sunday Telegraph; and if he will make a statement. - Includes ref to 326 c21-34.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, at what time on 20th February he applied for an injunction against the Sunday Telegraph; and if he will make a statement. - Includes ref to 326 c21-34.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what discussions he held with (a) the Prime Minister, (b) officials at Number 10 Downing Street and (c) other Ministers prior to seeking an injunction against The Sunday Telegraph; and if he will make a statement. - Inc ref to...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what discussions he held with (a) the Prime Minister, (b) officials at Number 10 Downing Street and (c) other Ministers prior to seeking an injunction against The Sunday Telegraph; and if he will make a statement. - Inc ref to...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he plans to apply for the lifting of the injunction presently in force against the Mail on Sunday. - Inc ref to 300 c215-6W.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he plans to apply for the lifting of the injunction presently in force against the Mail on Sunday. - Inc ref to 300 c215-6W.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if the injunction against the Mail on Sunday remains in force following the publication of further disclosures from David Shayler on 2nd November.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if the injunction against the Mail on Sunday remains in force following the publication of further disclosures from David Shayler on 2nd November.
Protection from Harassment Bill. Second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Committed to a Committee of the Whole House. Committee stage first day. Clauses 1 and 2 agreed to, clause 2 as amended. Clause 3 under consideration.
Protection from Harassment Bill. Second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Committed to a Committee of the Whole House. Committee stage first day. Clauses 1 and 2 agreed to, clause 2 as amended. Clause 3 under consideration.