Skip to main content

1-8 of 8 results for subject:X-rays

Year X
1995

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

How many PDD12 claimants have appealed against category `O' x-ray evidence since September 1993. - The information requested is available only to 2 October 1994 when the total number of appeals was 3,416.

Asked by
Michael Clapham (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 March 1995
Reference
256 c224W
House
House of Commons

How many posthumous PDD12 claims there have been to date; and how many have received an award; how many PDD12 claimants rejected for an award when they were living because the X-ray evidence was category O have been made a posthumous award after death based on the findings of the...

Asked by
Michael Clapham (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 March 1995
Reference
256 c224W
House
House of Commons

That this House is extremely concerned that 13,995 former coal miners have had their applications for disablement benefit for chronic bronchitis and emphysema rejected in the year to September 1994 on the grounds that in each case there was no x-ray evidence of simple pneumoconiosis which is a qualifying condition;...

Primary sponsor
Michael Clapham (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
2 February 1995
Reference
538
House
House of Commons

How many applicants for benefit under the chronic bronchitis and emphysema regulations received new x-rays before examination. - Inc fact that disproportionate cost.

Asked by
Bill O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 1995
Reference
253 c131W
House
House of Commons

How many applicants for benefit under the chronic bronchitis and emphysema regulations had to obtain fresh x-rays because of over-exposure of previous x-rays. - Disproportionate cost.

Asked by
Bill O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 1995
Reference
253 c131W
House
House of Commons

How many applicants for benefit under the chronic bronchitis and emphysema regulations were turned down because the x-ray did not show category 1 pneumoconiosis; and of these in how many a post-mortem revealed evidence of pneumoconiosis.

Asked by
Bill O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 1995
Reference
253 c131W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to her Answer of 11th January, c145W,if she will consult with the relevant professional bodies in regard to the need to use suitable x-ray film for the detection of chronic bronchitis and emphysema.

Asked by
Lord Hardy of Wath
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 January 1995
Reference
252 c637W;252 c639W
House
House of Commons

If she will advise health authorities and NHS trusts that the use of normal x-ray film is unsuitable for the detection or assessment of severe arthritis and emphysema.

Asked by
Lord Hardy of Wath
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 January 1995
Reference
252 c145W
House
House of Commons