Skip to main content

1-20 of 32 results for subject:Trident

Year X
1996

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To estimate the total cost of the Trident nuclear submarine fleet, and how it is likely to be spread over the probable lifetime of the vessels. - Figure given.
Asked by
Lord Jenkins of Putney (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 1996
Reference
576 c1182-3
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 December 1996
Reference
576 c1182-3
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on Canberra Commission recommendations on elimination of nuclear weapons.
Asked by
Lord Jenkins of Putney (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 1996
Reference
576 c1182-3
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 December 1996
Reference
576 c1182-3
House
House of Lords

If he will estimate the total cost of the Trident programme. (Failed OPQ) - Inc figures.

Asked by
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 November 1996
Reference
4321; 286 c191W
House
House of Commons

What was the total defence expenditure on (a) the Polaris and (b) the Trident programmes in 1993-94 and 1994-95. - Table given.

Asked by
Margaret Ewing (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 1996
Reference
1477; 284 c195W
House
House of Commons

If he will comment on the progress of the Trident Programme. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
John Marshall (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 1996
Reference
370; 284 c75W
House
House of Commons

Defence Statistics 1996. House of Commons Library Research Paper 96/91. (Updates RP 95/98).

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
11 October 1996
Reference
RP96-91

Pursuant to his Answer of 10th July, Official Report, column 184W, how much of the remaining expenditure on the Trident programme will be spent in (a) the United Kingdom and (b) the United States of America. - Includes table.

Asked by
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 1996
Reference
37426; 281 c533W
House
House of Commons

What will be the additional contribution of the last Trident submarine to the United Kingdom's nuclear deterrent capability.

Asked by
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 1996
Reference
37394; 281 c484W
House
House of Commons

How many Trident submarines there are in the Trident programme; how many have been acquired; and how many are on station at any given time. - Inc figs.

Asked by
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 1996
Reference
37393; 281 c483W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to his Answer of 2nd July, Official Report, column 387W, if he will give a breakdown of the £700 million yet to be spent on the Trident programme. - Including figures.

Asked by
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 July 1996
Reference
36231; 281 c184W
House
House of Commons

What sums have been (a) spent on and (b) committed to the Trident programme to date. - Including figure.

Asked by
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 July 1996
Reference
35002; 280 c387W
House
House of Commons

What recent representations he has received about the viability of the nuclear deterrent. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
John Marshall (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 May 1996
Reference
26941; 277 c17W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 May 1996
Reference
277 c10
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on Trident, nuclear threat and nuclear deterrent.
Asked by
Julian Brazier (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 May 1996
Reference
277 c10
House
House of Commons

If the United Kingdom will retain its independent nuclear deterrent. - We shall maintain a minimum independent nuclear deterrent for as long as is necessary for this country's security. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Roy Thomason (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 April 1996
Reference
22321; 275 c93W
House
House of Commons

Report on Trident by the Ministry of Defence. MOD. 1996.

Deposited by
Ministry of Defence
Type
Deposited papers
Date
18 March 1996
Reference
Dep/3 2998a
House
House of Commons

Statement on his latest estimate of the cost of the Trident programme. - Including figures and ref to the Trident submarine programme report (in Library as DEP/3 2998(a)).

Asked by
Jim Spicer (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 March 1996
Reference
21359; 273 c678-9W
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion for the adjournment on the Royal Navy.

Lead member
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom
Answering member
Lord Murphy of Torfaen
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
1 February 1996
Reference
270 c1133-216
House
House of Commons