Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,007 results for subject:Databases

Year X
2005

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many children under the age of 18 years have been added to the national DNA database in each year since 1996.

Asked by
Grant Shapps (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 December 2005
Reference
440 c2890-1W; 38505
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 13 December 2005, Official Report, column 1857W, on First Great Western Services, by whom records on the reliability and punctuality of rail services between London and Worcestershire are kept.

Asked by
Peter Luff (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 December 2005
Reference
440 c2927W; 38542
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people who have not been charged or cautioned for an offence have DNA profiles stored in the police national database; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Baroness Featherstone (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 December 2005
Reference
440 c2889-90W; 34330
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the budget is for (a) the National Firearms Register and (b) the National Identity Card project for each year from 2002–03; and how many staff from his Department are working on each.

Asked by
Danny Alexander (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 December 2005
Reference
33241; 440 c2899W
House
House of Commons

The Justice and Home Affairs Council was held on 1–2 December in Brussels. I chaired the meeting along with my right hon. and noble Friend the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Lord Chancellor. My noble friend Baroness Ashton of Upholland also represented the presidency. I introduced the counter-terrorism...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
20 December 2005
Reference
440 c197-9WS
House
House of Commons

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. The Justice and Home Affairs Council was held on 1–2 December in Brussels. I chaired the meeting along with my right honourable and noble friend the Secretary of State for Constitutional...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Department
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Written statements
Date
20 December 2005
Reference
676 c175-8WS
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether there is provision to remove from the National DNA Database details of a DNA sample of a minor who has never been charged or cautioned.

Asked by
Grant Shapps (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
35616; 440 c2357-8W
House
House of Commons

As I have already observed on an earlier occasion, the noble Lord’s question gives me the opportunity to remind him that this Bill may well prove to be the Government’s poll tax. He ought to keep off that one. The Prime Minister may not have probed the detail—he is too busy...

Member
Lord Crickhowell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1550
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 259A:"Before Clause 37, insert the following new clause—" ““ESTIMATE OF COSTS (1)   Section 37 shall not come into effect until— (a)   the Secretary of State has submitted to Parliament a detailed estimate of the costs of implementing the powers contained in this Act (to be known as ““the Cost Estimate””); and (b)   each...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1543-7
House
House of Lords

I share the noble Baroness’s concern about costs. I shall try to be brief in my few remarks. If I may say so, with the greatest possible respect to noble and learned Law Lords, I note that in their most recent report, every Law Lord said that he agreed with the first Law Lord...

Member
Lord Barnett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1547-9
House
House of Lords

Of course I hear what the noble Lord says. I have been as crystal clear as I can be in relation to these issues and I have also said that the way of avoiding such penalties is simply to comply. I have made it clear that the Secretary of State can waive all or any...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1542
House
House of Lords

I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 256 to 259 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.] Clause 33 agreed to. Clauses 34 to 36 agreed to.

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1542-3
House
House of Lords

I thank all noble Lords who have spoken in this important debate on the part of the Bill relating to the commissioner’s work, which will affect the confidence that people may have in the operation of the whole scheme. It would be wrong of me to go into detail, and we...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1529-30
House
House of Lords

Clause 24(3)(c) does not exclude Clause 20 from the commissioner’s remit.

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1529
House
House of Lords

I accept that and I am extremely grateful for it. The point I raised followed on from what the noble Lord, Lord Thomas, said on Clause 24(3)(c) and whether the word ““relates”” in that clause could be taken to refer to Clause 20. I imagine that it could not but I would be grateful for confirmation.

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1529
House
House of Lords

I do not think that it is intended to be. I said that I would look at the first half of the noble Lord’s amendment, which says,"““the uses to which information recorded in the Register is being put””." I very much understood the way in which the noble Lord argued it. As it is...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1529
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Phillips, for raising this issue—although he is right in saying that much of it was dealt with in the earlier debate, in the very full response given by my noble friend Lady Scotland. I have a great deal of sympathy with the noble Lord, Lord Phillips,...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1532-4
House
House of Lords

I strongly support my noble friend’s amendment. I do not make the concession that he did, however, that the commissioner should not be the front-line recipient of complaints. If the commissioner’s office is not broad enough to take on that role, who will become the frontline recipient of complaints? Every person over...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1532
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 228:"Page 21, line 43, at end insert—" ““(   )   The Commissioner shall establish and operate a system to deal with individual complaints concerning the functioning of the Register and the use of information on it under the provisions of this Act in accordance with an order made by the Secretary...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1530-2
House
House of Lords

While I hear what the noble Lord says, we do not agree. Looking at the kind of complaints and the process here, we believe it is important to ensure that the procedure is accessible to people so that they can raise their concerns and know that they will be dealt with...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2005
Reference
676 c1528-9
House
House of Lords