Skip to main content

1-20 of 131 results for subject:Misrepresentation

Year X
2005

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Whether they have tested Eurofreeze products to ensure that they meet health standards; and, if so, what was the result.

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 2005
Reference
2718; 676 c117WA
House
House of Lords

In light of the alleged use of fraudulent health marks on poultry supplied by Eurofreeze (Ireland) Limited, what steps they have taken to review procedures for verifying the authenticity of marks used.

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 2005
Reference
2717; 676 c117WA
House
House of Lords

Following the interception of an illegal consignment of chicken shipped from China, when they began tracing meat supplied from Eurofreeze (Ireland) Limited to other companies.

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 2005
Reference
2715; 676 c116WA
House
House of Lords

Following the interception of an illegal consignment of chicken shipped from China, how many consignments of poultry meat supplied by Eurofreeze (Ireland) Limited have been traced; and what action has been taken.

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 2005
Reference
2716; 676 c117WA
House
House of Lords

That this House notes that the Government has acknowledged that there is a problem in relation to the regulation of endowment mortgages prior to 1st December 2001 whereby clients who accessed an endowment mortgage from a solicitor in Scotland who was not subject to Financial Services Authority regulation, do not...

Primary sponsor
Sandra Osborne (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
24 November 2005
Reference
1105
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the advice the Financial Services Authority offers those wanting to pursue a claim for the mis-selling of endowment mortgages.

Asked by
Adam Holloway (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2005
Reference
20040; 437 c1309W;437 c1298W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when (a) he and (b) his officials last met the Financial Services Authority to discuss compensation for those who were mis-sold endowment policies.

Asked by
Adam Holloway (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2005
Reference
20039; 437 c1309W;437 c1297W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the way compensation for the mis-selling of endowment mortgages is calculated.

Asked by
Adam Holloway (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2005
Reference
20041; 437 c1309W;437 c1298W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what plans she has to regulate firms who handle claims for compensation for endowment mis-selling; and if she will make a statement.

Asked by
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
13967; 436 c1936W;436 c1936W
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord. He spoke of the difficulty in defining secrecy, but later in his response asked: what better defence for the defendant to advance than an explanation of full disclosure? What would be wrong with putting that on the face of the Bill...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2005
Reference
673 c1434
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 18: After Clause 5, insert the following new clause— "ABOLITION OF OFFENCE OF CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD The common law offence of conspiracy to defraud is abolished." The noble Lord said: In speaking to Amendment No. 18, I will speak to the other amendments in this group: Amendments...

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2005
Reference
673 c1437-8
House
House of Lords

The Government have accepted the logic of the argument that one would want to move towards a position where everything was covered and where the practical conditions that I have identified had been met. That is stated in the Government’s response. But we are nowhere near that position at the...

Member
Lord Goldsmith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2005
Reference
673 c1446-8
House
House of Lords

This was an issue that the Law Commission quite specifically excluded from its review. It says at the beginning of its report that there are certain specialist branches of fraud that, in its view, required separate consideration. Among those it included tax evasion offences, and there is a footnote which...

Member
Lord Goldsmith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2005
Reference
673 c1457-8
House
House of Lords

Trading anecdote for anecdote, I recall circuit judges asking how to direct a jury along those lines. It is very difficult to ask them to reach such decisions.

Member
Lord Goldsmith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2005
Reference
673 c1418
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 11:"Page 2, line 11, leave out ““legal””" The noble Lord said: Amendments Nos. 11 and 12 relate to the commission of fraud by wrongfully failing to disclose information, which is dealt with in Clause   3 of the Bill. Clause 3 makes it an offence for a person dishonestly...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2005
Reference
673 c1425
House
House of Lords

I think it is a waste of time as I believe the amendment is also a waste of time.

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2005
Reference
673 c1419
House
House of Lords

I very much regret that my absence abroad prevented me attending the meeting to which the noble and learned Lord the Attorney-General referred or, indeed, knowing about it. Nor did I have an opportunity to read his letter until a moment ago. I am interested in the,"““one precise, clear and...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2005
Reference
673 c1449
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 1:"Page 1, line 7, leave out paragraph (b)." The noble Lord said: Grouped with this amendment is the Question on whether Clause 3 shall stand part of the Bill. The amendments test the purpose of Clause 3 in the scheme of the Bill. Clause 3 seems to...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2005
Reference
673 c1411
House
House of Lords

The Law Commission, in the report that noble Lords complimented at Second Reading, set out a number of paragraphs why it thought, and the Government agree, that it is desirable to have a specific offence of non-disclosure. The noble Lord is right that there are occasions when something that most...

Member
Lord Goldsmith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2005
Reference
673 c1411-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do now resolve itself into Committee on this Bill. Moved, That the House do now resolve itself into Committee.—(Lord Goldsmith.) On Question, Motion agreed to. House in Committee accordingly. [The DEPUTY CHAIRMAN OF COMMITTEES (Viscount Simon) in the Chair.] Clause 1...

Member
Lord Goldsmith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2005
Reference
673 c1411
House
House of Lords