Skip to main content

1-20 of 795 results for subject:Dogs

Year X
2006

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House welcomes the positive work for companion animals carried out by the Animals Asia Foundation in China; recognises that their programmes aim to work in partnership with the Chinese government to end the confiscation of dogs within Beijing and the slaughter of thousands of dogs across many Chinese...

Primary sponsor
Andrew Rosindell (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
490
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs who the members are of the England Implementation Group looking at the animal health and welfare strategy.

Asked by
David Drew (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2006
Reference
105466; 454 c728-9W;454 c730-1W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what factors were taken into account when deciding on the length of the consultation on the draft Mutilations (Permitted Procedures) (England) Regulations and the draft Docking of Working Dogs’ Tails (England) Regulations.

Asked by
David Drew (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2006
Reference
105467; 454 c729W;454 c731W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will estimate how many veterinary surgeons are willing to undertake tail docking.

Asked by
David Drew (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2006
Reference
105468; 454 c729W;454 c731W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what research he has (a) commissioned and (b) funded into the (i) safety and (ii) ethics of electric shock collars for dogs.

Asked by
David Drew (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2006
Reference
106400; 454 c420W;454 c422W
House
House of Commons

rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006 (Consequential Provisions) (England and Wales) Order 2006. First Report from the Statutory Instruments Committee. The noble Lord said: I thank the Committee for agreeing to take...

Member
Lord Evans of Temple Guiting (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2006
Reference
687 c35-8GC
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006 (consequential provisions) (england and wales) (SI 2006/3407). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Also debated with draft SI on Scotland Act 1998 (Transfer of Functions to the Scottish Ministers etc) (No 3). Grand Committee held...

Lead member
Lord Evans of Temple Guiting
Answering member
Duke of Montrose
Department
Scotland Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
5 December 2006
Reference
687 c35-42GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for having laid out these matters so extensively. We have not always agreed to take all the Scottish orders at the same time, because we generally get quite a pot-pourri of issues and sometimes one can couple them together and sometimes that seems a little more...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2006
Reference
687 c38-9GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Steel, for supporting these orders. As he said, devolution is a process and not an event. Orders were always anticipated as part of the sensible management of Scotland’s devolution settlement and the provisions in the Scotland Act recognised this. I am most grateful to...

Member
Lord Evans of Temple Guiting (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2006
Reference
687 c41-2GC
House
House of Lords

I, too, thank the Minister for his explanation of the legislation. On the animal welfare order, we as Liberal Democrats are keen to make sure that the Scottish Executive and the Scottish Parliament are able fully to use the powers that they should have in devolved areas. It clearly makes...

Member
Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2006
Reference
687 c39-40GC
House
House of Lords

I shall make a few remarks about the second of these orders, the transfer of functions to Scottish Ministers. I assume that the answer to my noble friend’s question is that, yes, food matters would be devolved to the Scottish Ministers. That is the whole point of the order. I...

Member
Lord Steel of Aikwood (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2006
Reference
687 c40-1GC
House
House of Lords

That this House welcomes the Kennel Club Dog Owners Group established by the Kennel Club to keep dog owners and local authorities up to date about dog control orders being introduced across the country as part of the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005; wishes the group every success; and...

Primary sponsor
Eric Martlew (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
23 November 2006
Reference
278
House
House of Commons

Consultation on Mutilations (Permitted Procedures) (England) Regulations and the Docking of Working Dogs' Tails (England) Regulations. Incl. regulatory impact assessments. 97 p.

Deposited by
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Consultation papers; Impact assessments; Deposited papers
Date
22 November 2006
Reference
DEP 06/2080
House
House of Commons

That this House strongly welcomes the European Commission's proposal to ban the import, export and sale of dog and cat fur products to the European Union; regrets that the UK is one of the EU's member states that does not already have a ban on the import, export or sale...

Primary sponsor
John Barrett (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
20 November 2006
Reference
167
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the United States' ban on the importation of products made with dog and cat fur; expresses concern that this ban means that more of these products may now be imported into the EU and the United Kingdom; is further concerned that consumers may not be aware...

Primary sponsor
Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
15 November 2006
Reference
104
House
House of Commons

That this House is appalled by the actions of extreme animal cruelty which take place in China's animal markets, where millions of cats and dogs are killed annually for human consumption; rejects the claim that these practices are part of a cultural tradition; condemns the cruel ways in which these...

Primary sponsor
Bob Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
15 November 2006
Reference
6
House
House of Commons

Whether, in view of the number of studies that have already been undertaken, they have made an assessment of the extent to which the further testing of electric shock collars on dogs is ethical.

Asked by
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
8061; 686 c161WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they have made an assessment of the quality of the study on electric shock collars by Matthijs B H Schilder and Joanne A M van der Borg; if so, what is that assessment; and whether further research on electric shock collars is necessary.

Asked by
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
8027; 686 c160-1WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they have made an assessment of the relevance of the effects of electric shock stimulion mice and rats to determining the welfare implications for electric shock collars worn around the neck of a dog.

Asked by
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
8062; 686 c161WA
House
House of Lords
Type
Public acts
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
CHAP 45 2006