Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,164 results for subject:Councillors

Year X
2007

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what guidance the Government has provided on whether councillors travelling to council meetings are deemed to be employed by their local authority for insurance purposes.

Asked by
Lord Pickles (Conservative)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2007
Reference
469 c540-1W;469 c542-3W; 171512
House
House of Commons

asked Her Majesty's Government:What guidance is available to district councillors in England on answering letters from those living in their wards and who are on the current electoral register.

Asked by
Lord Patten (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2007
Reference
447; 697 c40WA
House
House of Lords
Type
Public acts
Date
30 October 2007
Reference
CHAP 28 2007

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c360
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c360
House
House of Commons

I am pleased that the Minister has returned with proposals via the other place that reflect the concerns expressed earlier in Committee. It seemed extraordinary that there were to be two completely different processes, not just separate, but different when in operation. It is very much to the credit of...

Member
Lord Stunell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c362-3
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c363
House
House of Commons

I draw attention to amendment (a) to amendment No. 48 that was tabled by me and my hon. Friends. I again recognise the work that has been done by the Government and those in the other place to seek the concessions that the Minister has mentioned for extending the time...

Member
Alistair Burt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c335-7
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. If the argument is for a 12-month period between the order and the election, clearly the process of preparing the order, consulting on it and the consideration in the House beforehand mean precisely that one would have to make the changes a year before...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c335
House
House of Commons

I am sure that the hon. Gentleman will support that opinion with all his vigour.

Member
Alistair Burt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c337
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for that, but I do not follow his argument. All that our amendment asks is that a notice period be given; I do not think that that has any bearing on the running of an election. I do not think that the public...

Member
Alistair Burt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c337-8
House
House of Commons

Of course, as we learned recently, a week is a long time in politics; six months is almost an eternity. I think that the six-month date that the Lords decided on is correct, for all the reasons that the hon. Gentleman gives, but to reiterate an earlier point, the May...

Member
Andrew Gwynne (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c337
House
House of Commons

I also want to speak to amendment No. 48. I do not like elections to be run on the same day. People vote for a particular reason; at a local level, they may vote because they want efficient council services and they perceive that their local authority is doing a...

Member
Robert Syms (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c340
House
House of Commons

First, let me say that the string of Lords amendments that we are considering represent good progress. They improve the legislation. I want to speak to Lords amendment No. 48, as the hon. Member for North-East Bedfordshire (Alistair Burt) just did. The amendment is a great improvement on what was...

Member
Lord Stunell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c338-9
House
House of Commons

I declare an interest as a member of Tameside metropolitan council until next May. Metropolitan districts such as Tameside and Stockport—they cover my constituency—elect by thirds so, in reality, they have annual elections except for the fallow year. Would the Conservative amendment not mean that local authorities would be looking...

Member
Andrew Gwynne (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c335
House
House of Commons

We now move on to part 2 of the Bill, which deals with elections. In response to good debate, strong scrutiny and a well argued case in the other place, the Government made a number of amendments. As Members are aware, part 2 contains provisions on resolution periods, in which...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c334-5
House
House of Commons

This group of amendments to part 3 would remove the provisions allowing councils to operate a directly elected executive model of governance arrangements. We were disappointed when the provisions were removed from the Bill in the other place. Directly elected executives were an important element of the measures that we...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c351
House
House of Commons

The Minister could have argued for the return of the provisions, but as he has more than the modicum of common sense commonly associated with his colleagues on the Front Bench, he will not do so. If one Googles ““barmy””, one picks up hundreds of thousands of potential hits, not...

Member
Alistair Burt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c352
House
House of Commons

I appreciate the Minister giving way. He has given a clear hint of the Government's preference for June 2009. Will he therefore just accept that the 12-month rule rather than the six-month rule would be entirely appropriate?

Member
Lord Stunell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c345
House
House of Commons

I have a lot of sympathy for the right hon. Member for Suffolk, Coastal (Mr. Gummer) and the problem with his constituency name. I represent a constituency called Wentworth. It has a proud mining, steel-making and industrial heritage; yet the constituency, which is part of what should be Rotherham, North,...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2007
Reference
465 c345
House
House of Commons