Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,075 results for subject:Sexuality

Year X
2008

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
20 November 2008
Reference
DEP2008-2790
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department of Health
Type
Deposited papers
Date
5 November 2008
Reference
DEP2008-2595
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department of Health
Type
Deposited papers
Date
13 October 2008
Reference
DEP2008-2356
House
House of Commons

asked Her Majesty's Government:For each of the years 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2007, how many people applying for asylum on the ground of fear of persecution because of their sexuality have been (a) granted asylum, (b) refused asylum but not deported, and (c) refused asylum and deported; and which countries...

Asked by
Lord Roberts of Llandudno (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2008
Reference
4646; 703 c212WA
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answers by Lord Davies of Oldham on 22 April (WA 275–6) and 12 May (HL3251), what is the relevance of the possession of information by Arts Council England about the sexuality of members of the management committees, boards, governing bodies and councils of...

Asked by
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 May 2008
Reference
3563; 701 c206WA
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Davies of Oldham on 22 April (WA 275–6), whether sexual orientation monitoring is an informal requirement of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport for the Arts Council England.

Asked by
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
701 c103-4WA; 3251
House
House of Lords

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This is about introducing regulation that takes us into the 21st century. Not to do so would be a lost opportunity. I look forward to our discussions on these critical issues in Committee, and I shall finish by echoing the comments of the hon. Member for...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1161
House
House of Commons

I fully respect the Government's position, but equally they should respect the position of Members who, on an issue of conscience, will end up voting against the Government tonight. I will do that with sorrow, but I do not think that it will damage the Government in any way, and...

Member
Geraldine Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1065-6
House
House of Commons

I accept that point, too, and I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his intervention.

Member
Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1088
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for giving way. Will he place on record the fact that the Bill is not about creating Frankenstein-type monsters?

Member
Jim Devine (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1069
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State talks about providing the opportunity to consider these important ethical issues, but is it sufficient opportunity when we are given barely three hours to consider the issue of human admixed embryos and barely three hours to consider saviour siblings and the need for a father, as...

Member
David Burrowes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1066
House
House of Commons

I hope that the Secretary of State accepts that whatever Members' views about the Bill may be, we all want people with debilitating and incurable diseases to be treated and to live a full and long life. However, does he also accept that the scientific breakthroughs, to which he has...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1067
House
House of Commons

Greater breakthroughs than we have seen in the past are necessary. Of the three main controversial issues in the Bill, I am instinctively against human admixed embryos, for moral reasons. I make no bones about that. Mixing the life essence of humans and animals is plain wrong, and a slippery...

Member
Gary Streeter (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1107
House
House of Commons

May I first record my support for the establishment of a bioethics committee, as has been suggested by the hon. Member for Bolton, South-East (Dr. Iddon) and many other hon. Members? Like other hon. Members, I have received a lot of letters on these issues. Many have been from those...

Member
Richard Taylor (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1141-2
House
House of Commons

I am happy to be wholeheartedly behind the Bill. It builds on the 1990 Act, which has served us well. It provided a regulatory framework in which clinicians and scientific researchers have worked with confidence. The result is that the UK has been a world leader in the development of...

Member
Desmond Turner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1126-7
House
House of Commons

No. I have given way to my hon. Friend twice; I hope that she accepts that I have been generous.

Member
Alan Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1072
House
House of Commons

Is not one of the very important changes from any other consideration that we have given this issue the fact that the Government will, on this occasion, take key clauses in a Committee of the whole House, so that those of us who generally support many of the measures in...

Member
Lord Field of Birkenhead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1064
House
House of Commons

I commend the right hon. and learned Gentleman on how that Bill was handled. It would not then have been simply the role of the Secretary of State to decide how the process worked, and it is not simply my role to decide how it works on this occasion. I...

Member
Alan Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1064-5
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State says that he likes the way in which the 1990 Act was handled; large parts of that Bill were taken on the Floor of the House at the Committee stage. The difference on that occasion was that every Member of the House was given a free...

Member
Lord Clarke of Nottingham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1064
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State said that Baroness Warnock had made it clear that there was a perception of fear, and that the regulator would be tough and would give the public confidence in the new organisation. Can he point to any instance when a scientist or clinician has abused their...

Member
Lord Willis of Knaresborough (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2008
Reference
475 c1065
House
House of Commons