Skip to main content

1-20 of 51 results for house:"House of Lords"

Year X
2010
Primary member X
Davies of Oldham, Lord

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

More
Davies of Oldham, Lord (51)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, will the Minister recognise that, with his reply, he has disappointed a wide range of opinion in the House, including— to complete the position—Her Majesty’s Official Opposition? He will know that earlier this year we were looking positively towards this issue. We would have thought that the present Government would adopt something more than just a straightforward negative stance on a situation where it is quite clear that, with SIPPs being able to invest in these companies, there is a good case that ISA investors should be able to as well.
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 December 2010
Reference
723 c824
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is the Minister briefed on his obvious point? This is the second question where we have had a response from the Front Bench which is driven by the necessity for cuts and not for protection of the quality of the service. Will he address himself to that question?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 2010
Reference
723 c189
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the successive attempts by the noble Lord to define bankruptcy have looked quite pathetic... Well, his latest definition would indicate that every mortgage holder in Britain was bankrupt because they have substantial debts. The issue is whether these debts can be managed. He must draw a distinction between the situation of Ireland at the present time, or of Greece in recent times, and that of the United Kingdom, where, as has been indicated, our debt repayment is over a 14-year period.
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 December 2010
Reference
723 c116-7
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister not recognise the great anxiety about this situation? He says that ““we””—I presume that he therefore speaks on behalf of the Government—have no knowledge of the report either. This is a totally unsatisfactory situation when lessons need to be learnt about such an important development. Will he not therefore look at the extent to which Her Majesty’s Government can emphasise to the FSA the desirability of making more public the position it has taken up?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 December 2010
Reference
723 c124
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I quite appreciate the Minister approaching this issue with some care, because he will know the anxieties of the general public about the questions over the damage which heavy lorries do to our roads and the pollution that they create. However, is there any reason why he should delay the charging of heavy goods vehicles, given that at present he is all too well aware of the unfairness of foreign lorries coming into this country and using our roads without cost?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c1476
House
House of Lords
My Lords, it is all right for the Minister to say at the Dispatch Box that he will encourage local authorities and the police to be more active, but the Government have plans to reduce significantly the resources available to the police and to cut local authority budgets by 30 per cent. Will he also address the question of whether the Highway Code is entirely clear about the obligations of motorists with regard to parking at bus stops?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 November 2010
Reference
722 c957
House
House of Lords
My Lords, what is the Minister’s explanation for the length of time that is being taken over the introduction of the scheme? The Government courted the heavy goods vehicle industry in this country by saying in their manifesto that they intended to introduce a scheme. The coalition agreement and the business plan of the department stated that the scheme would be introduced, and yet we are now looking at a delay of at least four years before a scheme is introduced. Why is this, and will the Minister also rule out a charge that must be paid not just by foreign heavy goods vehicle operators but also by home-based hauliers?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 November 2010
Reference
722 c838-9
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Minister is responsible for the efficiency of his department and he will know the calamitous position that Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs was in earlier this year with regard to the settlement of our fellow citizens’ taxation matters. How does the Government's proposed determination to tackle tax evasion and avoidance square with a determination to cut 13,000 posts in HMRC over the next few years?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2010
Reference
721 c1311
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we respect the Chairman of Committee’s reservations about the proposal, but does he recognise that the Government and Opposition are as one in seeking to encourage cycling? Therefore, this proposal is constructive. I wish him well in his efforts to find a docking station somewhat closer than the existing one. I say for the benefit of the House that there is a most discreet and effective docking station right next to the National Gallery. I cannot think of a more enjoyable trip by bike than that between here and the National Gallery on a very wide and safe road.
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 October 2010
Reference
721 c1194
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is not the real problem for the foreseeable future that, with interests rates low, the returns on annuities will be well below people’s expectations? Could not the Government think more radically about this in the longer term? Could we not think of following the pattern adopted by some other European Governments on annuities, whereby people would be able to purchase government bonds at a slightly better rate of interest than obtains at present and at the same time contribute to the Government in the shorter term sums which would help the Exchequer?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2010
Reference
721 c887
House
House of Lords
My Lords, did the Minister notice that the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, as a loyal supporter of the coalition, failed to mention the very great investment indeed made by the last Labour Government in the west coast main line, which has raised the performance of the train service to the level it has reached today? Does he also accept that while we welcome his statement today about electrification in the north-west, he knows that the shortage of rolling stock is an acute issue, and that this relates to investment decisions on Thameslink in southern England? The two are related because of surplus rail stock that is destined to go to the north-west. Will he confirm that he will take that on board, because there is not much point in producing an infrastructure if you do not have the rolling stock to roll on it?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 October 2010
Reference
721 c707
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I ride a bike—in fact, I was riding one this morning—so I declare that interest, but, in balance, I also drive a car. Let us get the issue of bike problems into some kind of perspective. What percentage of the road accidents in which our fellow citizens died last year were due to lawbreaking by cyclists, and why are the Government abolishing Cycling England, which seeks to train cyclists?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 October 2010
Reference
721 c514
House
House of Lords
My Lords, should we not have high expectations for improved efficiency in HMRC’s tackling of tax evasion and avoidance, given that Sir Philip obviously understands the subtlety with which one can so organise one’s affairs as to minimise a contribution to the nation?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 October 2010
Reference
721 c219
House
House of Lords
Will the Minister reconsider the inadequate answer that he gave to my noble friend a moment ago? This Question is about traffic offences and congestion charges are part of traffic offences. My noble friend asked about the vast sums of money owed by certain diplomatic missions for their offences with regard to congestion charges in London. We want a better answer from the Minister.
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 October 2010
Reference
721 c114
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is it not the case that the local authorities are anticipating cutbacks in resources as well? Will the Minister take responsibility for the statement on his department’s website that, "““Without safety cameras to reduce speeding and make … roads safer, around 100 more people would be killed each year””?" Is the Minister going to deny that?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 October 2010
Reference
721 c3
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is the reduction in the use of ministerial cars a reflection of the priorities of the Government in cutting public expenditure or is it a reflection of the fact that more than half the Cabinet are wealthy enough to be able to afford their own cars and drivers?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 October 2010
Reference
721 c5
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the Minister has referred to the Green Paper on two occasions. Is he aware that an official identified it as very green because it reflected the inability of the Business Secretary to convince the Chancellor to adopt a more constructive approach to this issue? Does this not reflect usual tensions within the coalition? Does the noble Lord also recognise that the Budget has been received in such a way as to reduce the level of demand in this country rather than increase it?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 July 2010
Reference
720 c1291
House
House of Lords
My Lords, given the range of opinions that exist on the coalition Benches, from Europhiles to Eurosceptics, would it be possible for the Minister to prevail on the Leader of the House to provide a little niche corner for the noble Lord, Lord Pearson of Rannoch, as he speaks neither for these Benches nor on behalf of these Benches, so he should not speak from them?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 2010
Reference
720 c849
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we on this side wish the Minister well in the attempt to control Japanese knotweed. Will he emphasise that it is not just gardeners and people who own cultivated land who are concerned about it, but our public services? Knotweed represents a heavy cost on our railway system because of the threat that it represents.
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 June 2010
Reference
719 c1422-3
House
House of Lords
My Lords, will the noble Lord forgive me if I look upon the word "scope" as a somewhat weasel word in this context? If he is interpreting the position as one in which the length of trains and the length of stations are not to be changed, and the range of Crossrail—the areas which it will serve—is not to be changed, where on earth are the economies to come from?
Asked by
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 June 2010
Reference
719 c1312
House
House of Lords