Skip to main content

1-20 of 6,683 results for house:"House of Lords"

Department X
Department for Constitutional Affairs

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Department for Constitutional Affairs (6,683)

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I beg to introduce a Bill to promote the reform of the statute law by the repeal, in accordance with recommendations of the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, of certain enactments which, except in so far as their effect is preserved, are no longer of practical...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2008
Reference
699 c658
House
House of Lords

Statute Law (Repeals) Bill (HL). Presentation and first reading. (HL Bill 37).

Lead member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
Department
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Debates on bills
Date
27 February 2008
Reference
699 c658
House
House of Lords

Freedom of Information Act 2000: statistics on implementation in central government, Q3: July - September 2007. 40 p.

Deposited by
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Deposited papers
Date
13 December 2007
Reference
DEP2007-0343
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Freedom of Information Act 2000: statistics on implementation in central government, Q2: April - June 2007. 33 p.

Deposited by
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Deposited papers
Date
24 September 2007
Reference
DEP 07/2154
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Freedom of Information Act 2000: statistics on implementation in central government, Q1: January - March 2007. 34 p.

Deposited by
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Deposited papers
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
DEP 07/1513
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My Lords, before the noble Lord sits down, he has missed the point that small constituencies and shifting boundaries mean that MPs often do not have the same constituents over a period of time—and that impertinence can work both ways. This is a public general measure and, therefore, each House...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c406
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may intervene briefly in the gap to give a traditional and perhaps rather more constitutional view than that of the radicals opposite. I note that the noble Lord, Lord Norton, has never actually been in the other place, although he is a great expert on it....

Member
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c405-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to support my noble friend’s Bill. He is to be congratulated onhis initiative in bringing it forward. I wish to addressthe two principal changes it seeks to achieve. The first is a reduction in the number of parliamentary constituencies. As my noble friend has explained, we...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c402-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Bill has a very worthy aim: reducing the number of Members ofthe House of Commons. That would certainlyhave popular appeal, a point which was easily and effectively made by the noble Lord, Lord Baker. I wonder whether it would be as easy to argue in this place...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c407-8
House
House of Lords

It is, my Lords.

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c400
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord is absolutely right, but if you tried to even up the size of that constituency you would chop bits of it off and presumably relate it to Southampton, or wherever. The noble Lord is right—that is exactly the kind of conversation that needs to happen....

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c414-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry, I could not resist that—I was an Education Minister. The Bill raises some interesting questions about elected representation and constituencies in the House of Commons. Because we have a formal recommendation before us from the Committee on Standards in Public Life that the whole area...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c414
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to disagree with the noble Lord, but I will move on. Proportional representation is an irrelevant canard in this debate, as in any other. Proportional representation stands for permanent representation in government for the least popular party and that is why the Liberal Democrats like it....

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c411
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord has the figures for 1997 completely the wrong way round. On the basis of our share of the vote in the 1997 general election, there would have been 100 Liberal Democrat MPs fairly representing the people who had voted throughout the country rather than the...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c411
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it gives me great pleasure to respond to this debate on behalf of the Opposition, the more so as it has been introduced by my noble friend Lord Baker of Dorking, for which I thank him. He was a very distinguished memberof successive Conservative Governments who has, since...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c409-11
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with what the noble Lord, Lord Lea of Crondall, said: this is not the Bill to get this proposal on to the statute book. I am grateful for his instruction as to what goes on in another place and for his views on the merits of...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c422-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think the noble Lady refers to my noble friend Lord Steel’s Bill. This Bill does not mention people who have served jail sentences.

Member
Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c425
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if the noble Lord, Lord Lester, reads Hansard tomorrow, he will see that I said that I have no difficulty with the words in the Bill concerning the 92 hereditaries. However, I cannot support the Bill, for the reasons that I am going through at the moment. Perhaps...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c421-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join the sentiments expressed aboutthe noble Lord, Lord Avebury, with whom I havehad the privilege of working, and of having tea with yesterday. I congratulate him on introducing his Bill and giving us an opportunity to debate what is clearly, from the contributions made, an important subject....

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c438-41
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am extremely grateful to all those who have taken part in the debate, particularly to the Minister for listening so carefully and for giving us assurances that the Government are thinking about these matters in the hope of moving on, perhaps through the medium of the Bill...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 May 2007
Reference
692 c441-2
House
House of Lords